• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Ecol Evol . Risk of invasive waterfowl interaction with poultry production: Understanding potential for avian pathogen transmission via species dist

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Ecol Evol


. 2024 Jul 18;14(7):e11647.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.11647. eCollection 2024 Jul. Risk of invasive waterfowl interaction with poultry production: Understanding potential for avian pathogen transmission via species distribution models

Reilly T Jackson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Percival M Marshall[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chris Burkhart[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Julia Schneck[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Grant Kelly[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Caleb P Roberts[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Recent outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza have devastated poultry production across the United States, with more than 77 million birds culled in 2022-2024 alone. Wild waterfowl, including various invasive species, host numerous pathogens, including highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV), and have been implicated as catalysts of disease outbreaks among native fauna and domestic birds. In major poultry-producing states like Arkansas, USA, where the poultry sector is responsible for significant economic activity (>$4 billion USD in 2022), understanding the risk of invasive waterfowl interactions with domestic poultry is critical. Here, we assessed the risk of invasive waterfowl-poultry interaction in Arkansas by comparing the density of poultry production sites (chicken houses) to areas of high habitat suitability for two invasive waterfowl species, (Egyptian Goose [Alopochen aegyptiaca] and Mute Swan [Cygnus olor]), known to host significant pathogens, including avian influenza viruses. The percentage of urban land cover was the most important habitat characteristic for both invasive waterfowl species. At the 95% confidence interval, chicken house densities in areas highly suitable for both species (Egyptian Goose = 0.91 ± 0.11 chicken houses/km[SUP]2[/SUP]; Mute Swan = 0.61 ± 0.03 chicken houses/km[SUP]2[/SUP]) were three to five times higher than chicken house densities across the state (0.17 ± 0.01 chicken houses/km[SUP]2[/SUP]). We show that northwestern and western Arkansas, both areas of high importance for poultry production, are also at high risk of invasive waterfowl presence. Our results suggest that targeted monitoring efforts for waterfowl-poultry contact in these areas could help mitigate the risk of avian pathogen exposure in Arkansas and similar regions with high poultry production.

Keywords: Egyptian Goose; Mute Swan; human‐wildlife interaction; poultry; species distribution modeling.

 
Back
Top Bottom