• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Effectiveness of community pharmacies in improving seasonal influenza uptake-an evaluation using the Donabedian framework

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Jul 5:1-7. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx078. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Effectiveness of community pharmacies in improving seasonal influenza uptake-an evaluation using the Donabedian framework.[/h] Rai GK[SUP]1[/SUP], Wood A[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]Background:[/h] Community pharmacies are now commissioned nationally in England to provide a seasonal influenza vaccination service. However, there is little evidence about the effectiveness of a pharmacy-based immunization service in improving uptake.
[h=4]Methods:[/h] The Donabedian framework was used to evaluate a community pharmacy service in the West Midlands from a commissioning perspective. A mixed methods approach was adopted, including provider and patient surveys, data from the national influenza vaccination returns and an electronic pharmacy data recording system.
[h=4]Results:[/h] Patient satisfaction with the service was high. There was no increase in uptake rates. Impact on reaching new patients was limited. The service had an appropriate information system to record activity. Promotion and signposting for the service was weak. Poor engagement with stakeholders led to dissatisfaction and General Practitioner complaints. Commissioners responded to emerging issues to ensure the pharmacies' set up was compliant with the Service Level Agreement.
[h=4]Conclusions:[/h] Improvements in convenience and choice for patients did not result in an increase in uptake rates. With a national pharmacy influenza programme, local arrangements to optimize the service may be limited. Clear arrangements for activity transfer and recording, partnership working and a good communications strategy are crucial in achieving a positive outcome.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] immunization; population-based and preventative services; public health

PMID: 29106582 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx078
 
Back
Top Bottom