• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Effectiveness of post-exposition prophylaxis with oseltamivir in nursing homes: a randomised controlled trial over four seasons

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2014 Sep 10;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-11-13. eCollection 2014.
Effectiveness of post-exposition prophylaxis with oseltamivir in nursing homes: a randomised controlled trial over four seasons.
van der Sande MA1, Meijer A2, Sen-Kerpiclik F2, Enserink R1, Cools HJ3, Overduin P2, Ferreira JM4, Veldman-Ariessen MJ2.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Oseltamivir has been registered for use as post-exposition prophylaxis (PEP) following exposure to influenza, based on studies among healthy adults. Effectiveness among frail elderly nursing home populations still needs to be properly assessed.
METHODS:

We conducted a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of PEP with either oseltamivir (75 mg once daily) or placebo among nursing home units where influenza virus was detected; analysis was unblinded. The primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed influenza among residents in units on PEP; the secondary outcome was clinical diagnosis of influenza-like illness (ILI).
RESULTS:

42 nursing homes were recruited, in which 17 outbreaks occurred from 2009 through 2013, two caused by influenza virus B, the others caused by influenza virus A(H3N2). Randomisation was successful in 15 outbreaks, with a few chance differences in baseline indicators. Six outbreaks were assigned to oseltamivir and nine to placebo. Influenza virus positive secondary ILI cases were detected in 2/6 and 2/9 units respectively (ns); secondary ILI cases occurred in 2/6 units on oseltamivir, and 5/9 units on placebo (ns). Logistical challenges in ensuring timely administration were considerable.
CONCLUSION:

We did not find statistical evidence that PEP with oseltamivir given to nursing home residents in routine operational settings exposed to influenza reduced the risk of new influenza infections within a unit nor that of developing ILI. Power however was limited due to far fewer outbreaks in nursing homes than expected since the 2009 pandemic. (RCT nr NL92738).
KEYWORDS:

Influenza outbreaks; Nursing homes; Oseltamivir; Post-exposition prophylaxis; RCT

PMID:
25210532
[PubMed]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25210532
 
Back
Top Bottom