• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Efficacy and effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccination for older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018 May 1. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2018.1471989. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Efficacy and effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccination for older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.[/h] Lee JKH[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Lam GKL[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Shin T[SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Kim J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Krishnan A[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Greenberg DP[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Chit A[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Influenza is responsible for a significant disease burden annually, especially in older adults. This study reviews the relative vaccine efficacy or effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (HD-IIV3) compared to standard-dose influenza vaccines (IIV3) in adults ≥65 against influenza-associated outcomes to inform evidence-based decision-making to shift clinical practice and standard of care in this population.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A systematic review was conducted for studies assessing the rVE of HD-IIV3 against probable/laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness (ILI), hospital admissions, and death in adults ≥65. Results from individual seasons were meta-analyzed and the random-effects model was used to estimate pooled rVEs.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] After screening 992 studies, seven studies were meta-analyzed. HD-IIV3 demonstrated improved protection against ILI compared to SD-IIV3 (rVE=19.5%; 95%CI:88.6-29.0%). HD-IIV3 was also more effective at preventing hospital admissions from all-causes (rVE=9.1%; 95%CI:2.4-15.3%), as well as influenza (rVE=17.8%; 95%CI: 8.1-26.5%), pneumonia (rVE=24.3%, 95%CI:13.9-33.4%),4and cardiorespiratory events (rVE=18.2%; 95%CI:6.8-28.1%). rVE against post-influenza mortality was 22.2% (95%CI:-18.2-48.8%) and 2.5% (95%CI:-5.2-9.5%) against all-cause mortality.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Available evidence suggests HD-IIV3 is more effective than SD-IIV3 at reducing the clinical outcomes associated with influenza infection in older adults and should be considered for routine use in the 65+ population.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Death; Effectiveness; Efficacy; Elderly; High Dose Influenza Vaccine; Hospitalization; Influenza; Meta-Analysis; Seniors; Systematic Review

PMID: 29715054 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2018.1471989
 
Back
Top Bottom