• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Elife . Boosting of cross-reactive antibodies to endemic coronaviruses by SARS-CoV-2 infection but not vaccination with stabilized spike

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Elife


. 2022 Mar 15;11:e75228.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.75228.
Boosting of cross-reactive antibodies to endemic coronaviruses by SARS-CoV-2 infection but not vaccination with stabilized spike


Andrew R Crowley[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Harini Natarajan[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew P Hederman[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Carly A Bobak[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Joshua A Weiner[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Wendy Wieland-Alter[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jiwon Lee[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Evan M Bloch[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Aaron A R Tobian[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Andrew D Redd[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Joel N Blankson[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Dana Wolf[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Tessa Goetghebuer[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Arnaud Marchant[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Ruth I Connor[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Peter F Wright[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Margaret E Ackerman[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Preexisting antibodies to endemic coronaviruses (CoV) that cross-react with SARS-CoV-2 have the potential to influence the antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination and infection for better or worse. In this observational study of mucosal and systemic humoral immunity in acutely infected, convalescent, and vaccinated subjects, we tested for cross-reactivity against endemic CoV spike (S) protein at subdomain resolution. Elevated responses, particularly to the β-CoV OC43, were observed in all natural infection cohorts tested and were correlated with the response to SARS-CoV-2. The kinetics of this response and isotypes involved suggest that infection boosts preexisting antibody lineages raised against prior endemic CoV exposure that cross-react. While further research is needed to discern whether this recalled response is desirable or detrimental, the boosted antibodies principally targeted the better-conserved S2 subdomain of the viral spike and were not associated with neutralization activity. In contrast, vaccination with a stabilized spike mRNA vaccine did not robustly boost cross-reactive antibodies, suggesting differing antigenicity and immunogenicity. In sum, this study provides evidence that antibodies targeting endemic CoV are robustly boosted in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection but not to vaccination with stabilized S, and that depending on conformation or other factors, the S2 subdomain of the spike protein triggers a rapidly recalled, IgG-dominated response that lacks neutralization activity.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; conformation; epitope; human; immunology; infectious disease; inflammation; microbiology; neutralization; vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom