• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Elife . mRNA vaccination in people over 80 years of age induces strong humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 with cross neutralisation of P.1

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Elife


. 2021 Sep 29;10:e69375.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.69375. Online ahead of print.
mRNA vaccination in people over 80 years of age induces strong humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 with cross neutralisation of P.1 Brazilian variant


Helen Parry[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gokhan Tut[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rachel Bruton[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sian Faustini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Christine Stephens[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Philip Saunders[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Christopher Bentley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katherine Hilyard[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kevin Brown[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Gayatri Amirthalingam[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sue Charlton[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Stephanie Leung[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Emily Chiplin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Naomi S Coombes[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kevin R Bewley[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Elizabeth J Penn[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Cathy Rowe[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ashley Otter[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Rosie Watts[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Silvia D'Arcangelo[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Bassam Hallis[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Andrew Makin[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Alex Richter[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jianmin Zuo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paul Moss[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article

Abstract

Age is the major risk factor for mortality after SARS-CoV-2 infection and older people have received priority consideration for COVID-19 vaccination. However vaccine responses are often suboptimal in this age group and few people over the age of 80 years were included in vaccine registration trials. We determined the serological and cellular response to spike protein in 100 people aged 80-96 years at 2 weeks after second vaccination with the Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Antibody responses were seen in every donor with high titres in 98%. Spike-specific cellular immune responses were detectable in only 63% and correlated with humoral response. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection substantially increased antibody responses after one vaccine and antibody and cellular responses remained 28-fold and 3-fold higher respectively after dual vaccination. Post-vaccine sera mediated strong neutralisation of live Victoria infection and although neutralisation titres were reduced 14-fold against the P.1 variant first discovered in Brazil they remained largely effective. These data demonstrate that the mRNA vaccine platform delivers strong humoral immunity in people up to 96 years of age and retains broad efficacy against the P.1 Variant of Concern.

Keywords: human; infectious disease; microbiology.
 
Back
Top Bottom