tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Emerg Radiol
. 2021 Jul 29.
doi: 10.1007/s10140-021-01937-y. Online ahead of print.
Comparing the first and the second waves of COVID-19 in Italy: differences in epidemiological features and CT findings using a semi-quantitative score
Caterina Balacchi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nicolò Brandi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Federica Ciccarese[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Francesca Coppola[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vincenzo Lucidi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laura Bartalena[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Parmeggiani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alexandro Paccapelo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rita Golfieri[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Purpose: CT findings of hospitalized COVID-19 patients were analyzed during both the first and the second waves of the pandemic, in order to detect any significant differences between the two groups.
Methods: In this observational, retrospective, monocentric study, all hospitalized patients who underwent CT for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia from February 27 to March 27, 2020 (first wave) and from October 26 to November 24, 2020 (second wave) were enrolled. Epidemiological data, radiological pattern according to the RSNA consensus statement and visual score extension using a semi-quantitative score were compared.
Results: Two hundred and eleven patients (mean age, 64.52 years ± 15.14, 144 males) were evaluated during the first wave while 455 patients (mean age, 68.26 years ± 16.34, 283 males) were studied during the second wave. The same prevalence of patterns was documented in both the first and the second waves (p = 0.916), with non-typical patterns always more frequently observed in elderly patients, especially the "indeterminate" pattern. Compared to those infected during the first wave, the patients of the second wave were older (64.52 vs.68.26, p = 0.005) and presented a slightly higher mean semi-quantitative score (9.0 ± 2.88 vs. 8.4 ± 3.06, p = 0.042). Age and semi-quantitative score showed a positive correlation (r = 0.15, p = 0.001).
Conclusions: There was no difference regarding CT pattern prevalence between the first and the second waves, confirming both the validity of the RSNA consensus and the most frequent radiological COVID-19 features. Non-typical COVID-19 features were more frequently observed in older patients, thus should not be underestimated in the elderly population.
Keywords: COVID-19; CT; Coronavirus; First wave; SARS-CoV-2; Second wave.
. 2021 Jul 29.
doi: 10.1007/s10140-021-01937-y. Online ahead of print.
Comparing the first and the second waves of COVID-19 in Italy: differences in epidemiological features and CT findings using a semi-quantitative score
Caterina Balacchi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nicolò Brandi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Federica Ciccarese[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Francesca Coppola[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vincenzo Lucidi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laura Bartalena[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Parmeggiani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alexandro Paccapelo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rita Golfieri[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34322767
- DOI: 10.1007/s10140-021-01937-y
Abstract
Purpose: CT findings of hospitalized COVID-19 patients were analyzed during both the first and the second waves of the pandemic, in order to detect any significant differences between the two groups.
Methods: In this observational, retrospective, monocentric study, all hospitalized patients who underwent CT for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia from February 27 to March 27, 2020 (first wave) and from October 26 to November 24, 2020 (second wave) were enrolled. Epidemiological data, radiological pattern according to the RSNA consensus statement and visual score extension using a semi-quantitative score were compared.
Results: Two hundred and eleven patients (mean age, 64.52 years ± 15.14, 144 males) were evaluated during the first wave while 455 patients (mean age, 68.26 years ± 16.34, 283 males) were studied during the second wave. The same prevalence of patterns was documented in both the first and the second waves (p = 0.916), with non-typical patterns always more frequently observed in elderly patients, especially the "indeterminate" pattern. Compared to those infected during the first wave, the patients of the second wave were older (64.52 vs.68.26, p = 0.005) and presented a slightly higher mean semi-quantitative score (9.0 ± 2.88 vs. 8.4 ± 3.06, p = 0.042). Age and semi-quantitative score showed a positive correlation (r = 0.15, p = 0.001).
Conclusions: There was no difference regarding CT pattern prevalence between the first and the second waves, confirming both the validity of the RSNA consensus and the most frequent radiological COVID-19 features. Non-typical COVID-19 features were more frequently observed in older patients, thus should not be underestimated in the elderly population.
Keywords: COVID-19; CT; Coronavirus; First wave; SARS-CoV-2; Second wave.