• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Employee influenza vaccination in a large cancer center with high baseline compliance rates: Comparison of carrot versus stick approaches

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Mar 1;43(3):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.11.025.
[h=1]Employee influenza vaccination in a large cancer center with high baseline compliance rates: Comparison of carrot versus stick approaches.[/h] Podczervinski S[SUP]1[/SUP], Stednick Z[SUP]2[/SUP], Helbert L[SUP]1[/SUP], Davies J[SUP]3[/SUP], Jagels B[SUP]1[/SUP], Gooley T[SUP]4[/SUP], Casper C[SUP]5[/SUP], Pergam SA[SUP]6[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Influenza is a major complication in patients with cancer and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. We set out to maximize influenza vaccination rates in health care personnel at our large ambulatory cancer center with high baseline compliance and to assess alternatives to mandatory policies.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Baseline influenza vaccine compliance rates at our center were >85%. During 2011 an incentive-based "carrot" campaign was implemented, and in 2012 a penalty-based "stick" approach to declining staff was required. Yearly approaches were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Both the incentive and penalty approaches significantly improved the baseline rates of vaccination (2010 vs 2011 P = .0001 and 2010 vs 2012 P < .0001), and 2012 significantly improved over 2011 (P < .0001). Staff with direct patient contact had significantly higher rates of vaccination compared with those with indirect and minimal contact in every campaign year, except in the penalty-driven campaign from 2012 (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .24 and P < .001, P < .001, and P = .17, respectively).
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] A multifaceted staff vaccination program that included education, training, and active declination was more effective than a program offering incentives. Improvements in vaccination rates in the penalty-driven campaign were driven by staff without direct care responsibilities. High compliance with systemwide influenza vaccination was achieved without requiring mandatory vaccination.
Copyright ? 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Compliance; Health care personnel; Occupational health; Vaccine

PMID: 25728148 [PubMed - in process]
 
Back
Top Bottom