• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Epidemiology . Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines as First Booster Doses in England: An Observational Study in OpenSAFELY-TPP

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Epidemiology


. 2024 Jul 1;35(4):568-578.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001747. Epub 2024 Jun 24. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines as First Booster Doses in England: An Observational Study in OpenSAFELY-TPP

Elsie M F Horne[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], William J Hulme[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Edward P K Parker[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ruth H Keogh[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Elizabeth J Williamson[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Venexia M Walker[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP], Tom M Palmer[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP], Rachel Denholm[SUP] 1 2 6 [/SUP], Rochelle Knight[SUP] 1 2 5 7 [/SUP], Helen J Curtis[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alex J Walker[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Colm D Andrews[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Amir Mehrkar[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jessica Morley[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Brian MacKenna[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sebastian C J Bacon[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ben Goldacre[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Miguel A Hernán[SUP] 8 9 [/SUP], Jonathan A C Sterne[SUP] 1 2 6 [/SUP]; and the OpenSAFELY collaborative



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The UK delivered its first "booster" COVID-19 vaccine doses in September 2021, initially to individuals at high risk of severe disease, then to all adults. The BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was used initially, then also Moderna mRNA-1273.
Methods: With the approval of the National Health Service England, we used routine clinical data to estimate the effectiveness of boosting with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 compared with no boosting in eligible adults who had received two primary course vaccine doses. We matched each booster recipient with an unboosted control on factors relating to booster priority status and prior COVID-19 immunization. We adjusted for additional factors in Cox models, estimating hazard ratios up to 182 days (6 months) following booster dose. We estimated hazard ratios overall and within the following periods: 1-14, 15-42, 43-69, 70-97, 98-126, 127-152, and 155-182 days. Outcomes included a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, COVID-19 hospitalization, COVID-19 death, non-COVID-19 death, and fracture.
Results: We matched 8,198,643 booster recipients with unboosted controls. Adjusted hazard ratios over 6-month follow-up were: positive SARS-CoV-2 test 0.75 (0.74, 0.75); COVID-19 hospitalization 0.30 (0.29, 0.31); COVID-19 death 0.11 (0.10, 0.14); non-COVID-19 death 0.22 (0.21, 0.23); and fracture 0.77 (0.75, 0.78). Estimated effectiveness of booster vaccines against severe COVID-19-related outcomes peaked during the first 3 months following the booster dose. By 6 months, the cumulative incidence of positive SARS-CoV-2 test was higher in boosted than unboosted individuals.
Conclusions: We estimate that COVID-19 booster vaccination, compared with no booster vaccination, provided substantial protection against COVID-19 hospitalization and COVID-19 death but only limited protection against positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Lower rates of fracture in boosted than unboosted individuals may suggest unmeasured confounding. Observational studies should report estimated vaccine effectiveness against nontarget and negative control outcomes.


 
Back
Top Bottom