tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
ERJ Open Res
. 2023 Apr 11;9(2):00481-2022.
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00481-2022. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Outcome prediction model and prognostic biomarkers for COVID-19 patients in Vietnam
Hien Thi Thu Nguyen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Vang Le-Quy[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Son Van Ho[SUP] 5 4 [/SUP], Jakob Holm Dalsgaard Thomsen[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Malene Pontoppidan Stoico[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Hoang Van Tong[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Nhat-Linh Nguyen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Henrik Bygum Krarup[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Son Hong Nguyen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Viet Quoc Tran[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Linh Toan Nguyen[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan[SUP] 2 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Accurate prognosis is important either after acute infection or during long-term follow-up of patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. This study aims to predict coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity based on clinical and biological indicators, and to identify biomarkers for prognostic assessment.
Methods: We included 261 Vietnamese COVID-19 patients, who were classified into moderate and severe groups. Disease severity prediction based on biomarkers and clinical parameters was performed by applying machine learning and statistical methods using the combination of clinical and biological data.
Results: The random forest model could predict with 97% accuracy the likelihood of COVID-19 patients who subsequently worsened to the severe condition. The most important indicators were interleukin (IL)-6, ferritin and D-dimer. The model could still predict with 92% accuracy after removing IL-6 from the analysis to generalise the applicability of the model to hospitals with limited capacity for IL-6 testing. The five most effective indicators were C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, IL-6, ferritin and dyspnoea. Two different sets of biomarkers (D-dimer, IL-6 and ferritin, and CRP, D-dimer and IL-6) are applicable for the assessment of disease severity and prognosis. The two biomarker sets were further tested through machine learning algorithms and relatively validated on two Danish COVID-19 patient groups (n=32 and n=100). The results indicated that various biomarker sets combined with clinical data can be used for detection of the potential to develop the severe condition.
Conclusion: This study provided a simple and reliable model using two different sets of biomarkers to assess disease severity and predict clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Vietnam.
. 2023 Apr 11;9(2):00481-2022.
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00481-2022. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Outcome prediction model and prognostic biomarkers for COVID-19 patients in Vietnam
Hien Thi Thu Nguyen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Vang Le-Quy[SUP] 2 3 4 [/SUP], Son Van Ho[SUP] 5 4 [/SUP], Jakob Holm Dalsgaard Thomsen[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Malene Pontoppidan Stoico[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Hoang Van Tong[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Nhat-Linh Nguyen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Henrik Bygum Krarup[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Son Hong Nguyen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Viet Quoc Tran[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Linh Toan Nguyen[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan[SUP] 2 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37041987
- PMCID: PMC9885243
- DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00481-2022
Abstract
Background: Accurate prognosis is important either after acute infection or during long-term follow-up of patients infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. This study aims to predict coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity based on clinical and biological indicators, and to identify biomarkers for prognostic assessment.
Methods: We included 261 Vietnamese COVID-19 patients, who were classified into moderate and severe groups. Disease severity prediction based on biomarkers and clinical parameters was performed by applying machine learning and statistical methods using the combination of clinical and biological data.
Results: The random forest model could predict with 97% accuracy the likelihood of COVID-19 patients who subsequently worsened to the severe condition. The most important indicators were interleukin (IL)-6, ferritin and D-dimer. The model could still predict with 92% accuracy after removing IL-6 from the analysis to generalise the applicability of the model to hospitals with limited capacity for IL-6 testing. The five most effective indicators were C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, IL-6, ferritin and dyspnoea. Two different sets of biomarkers (D-dimer, IL-6 and ferritin, and CRP, D-dimer and IL-6) are applicable for the assessment of disease severity and prognosis. The two biomarker sets were further tested through machine learning algorithms and relatively validated on two Danish COVID-19 patient groups (n=32 and n=100). The results indicated that various biomarker sets combined with clinical data can be used for detection of the potential to develop the severe condition.
Conclusion: This study provided a simple and reliable model using two different sets of biomarkers to assess disease severity and predict clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Vietnam.