• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Estimating influenza disease burden among pregnant women: Application of self-control method

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2017 Aug 24;35(36):4811-4816. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.006.
[h=1]Estimating influenza disease burden among pregnant women: Application of self-control method.[/h] Ohfuji S[SUP]1[/SUP], Deguchi M[SUP]2[/SUP], Tachibana D[SUP]3[/SUP], Koyama M[SUP]3[/SUP], Takagi T[SUP]4[/SUP], Yoshioka T[SUP]5[/SUP], Urae A[SUP]6[/SUP], Fukushima W[SUP]7[/SUP], Hirota Y[SUP]8[/SUP]; Osaka Pregnant Women Influenza Study Group.
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] To evaluate influenza disease burden among pregnant women, an epidemiological study using the self-control method was conducted. Study subjects were 12,838 pregnant women who visited collaborating maternity hospitals and clinics in Osaka Prefecture, Japan, before the 2013/14 influenza season. As a study outcome, hospitalization due to respiratory illnesses between the 2010/11 and 2013/14 seasons was collected from each study subject through a baseline survey at the time of recruitment and a second survey after the 2013/14 season. The hospitalization rates during pregnancy and non-pregnancy periods was calculated separately. To compare the hospitalization rate during pregnancy with that during non-pregnancy within the same single study subject, Mantel-Haenzel rate ratios (RR[SUB]MH[/SUB]) were calculated. During the four seasons examined in this study, nine and 17 subjects were hospitalized due to respiratory illnesses during pregnancy and non-pregnancy periods, respectively. The hospitalization rate was 2.54 per 10,000 woman-months during pregnancy and 1.08 per 10,000 woman-months during non-pregnancy. The RR[SUB]MH[/SUB] for the hospitalization rate during pregnancy compared with that during non-pregnancy was 4.30 (95% confidence interval, 1.96-9.41). Our results suggest that during the influenza season, pregnant women have a higher risk than non-pregnant women for hospitalization due to respiratory illnesses. The self-control method appears to be an appropriate epidemiological method for evaluating the disease burden of influenza among pregnant women.
Copyright ? 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Disease burden; Influenza; Pregnant women; Self-control method

PMID: 28818474 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.006
 
Back
Top Bottom