• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness using data routinely available in electronic primary care records

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2018 Dec 29. pii: S0264-410X(18)31651-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.006. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness using data routinely available in electronic primary care records.[/h] Regan AK[SUP]1[/SUP], Gibbs R[SUP]2[/SUP], Bloomfield L[SUP]3[/SUP], Effler PV[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] To support timely, annual estimation of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE), we explored the use of automated data extraction from general practice records to estimate VE over four consecutive southern hemisphere influenza seasons.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A software tool installed at 130 practices in Western Australia identified all outpatients tested for influenza by polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) during annual influenza seasons occurring 2012-2015. Laboratory test results were collated with any existing record of influenza vaccine administered in the same year; limited patient demographic and clinical information was also collected. A case test-negative control analysis compared the odds of seasonal influenza vaccination between patients positive or negative for influenza by PCR with VE = 1 - the odds ratio.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] A total of 7270 influenza PCR test results were identified of which 1907 (26.2%) were positive; 9.4% of patients with a positive result had received contemporaneous influenza vaccination ≥14 days prior to specimen collection, compared to 17.9% of those with a negative result. Overall VE was 52% (95% CI, 43-60%); annual VE estimates ranged from 46% (95% CI, 22-63%) in 2012 to 60% (95% CI, 41-73%) in 2014.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Electronic records routinely maintained by general practice provide a promising opportunity for estimating annual influenza VE in a timely and resource-efficient manner.
Crown Copyright ? 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Influenza; Primary health care; Surveillance; Test-negative design; Vaccine effectiveness; Vaccines and immunisation

PMID: 30600119 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.006
 
Back
Top Bottom