tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
. 2023 Mar 21.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07923-z. Online ahead of print.
Comparison of prevalence and evolution of COVID-19 olfactory disorders in patients infected by D614 (wild) and B.1.1.7. Alpha variant: a brief report
Jerome R Lechien[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 3 4 5 [/SUP], Shannon Wajsblat[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 6 [/SUP], Mihaela Horoi[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Serge D Le Bon[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Luigi A Vaira[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Sven Saussez[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 11 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the prevalence and the evolution of olfactory disorders (OD) related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients infected during the first and the second European waves.
Methods: From March 2020 to October 2020, COVID-19 patients with OD were recruited and followed over the 12-month post-infection. The following data were collected: demographic, treatments, vaccination status, and olfactory function. Olfaction was assessed with the Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire (ODQ), and threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) test. Outcomes were compared between patients of the first wave (group 1: wild/D614G virus) and the second wave (group 2: B.1.1.7. Alpha variant) at 1-, 3- and 12-month post-infection.
Results: Sixty patients completed the evaluations accounting for 33 and 27 patients in group 1 and 2, respectively. The 1-month TDI score (23.7 ± 5.3) was significantly lower in group 2 compared to group 1 (29.8 ± 8.7; p = 0.017). Proportion of normosmic patients at 1-month post-infection was significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (p = 0.009). TDI scores only significantly increased from 1- to 3-month post-infection in anosmic and hyposmic patients. Focusing on There was a negative association between the 1-month ODQ and the 1-month TDI (r[SUB]s[/SUB] = - 0.493; p = 0.012). ODQ was a significant predictor of TDI scores at 3- and 12-month post-infection. The 12-month prevalence of parosmia was 60.6% in group 1 and 42.4% in group 2, respectively. There was no significant influence of oral corticosteroid treatment, adherence to an olfactory training and vaccination status on the olfactory outcomes.
Conclusions: Patients of the second wave (Alpha B.1.1.7. variant) reported significant higher proportion of psychophysical test abnormalities at 1-month post-infection than patients infected during the first wave (D614G virus).
Keywords: Anosmia; COVID-19; Olfactory; Otolaryngology; Parosmia; Recovery; Rhinology; SARS-CoV-2; Smell; Variant.
. 2023 Mar 21.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07923-z. Online ahead of print.
Comparison of prevalence and evolution of COVID-19 olfactory disorders in patients infected by D614 (wild) and B.1.1.7. Alpha variant: a brief report
Jerome R Lechien[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 3 4 5 [/SUP], Shannon Wajsblat[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 6 [/SUP], Mihaela Horoi[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Serge D Le Bon[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Luigi A Vaira[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Sven Saussez[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 11 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 36943439
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07923-z
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the prevalence and the evolution of olfactory disorders (OD) related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients infected during the first and the second European waves.
Methods: From March 2020 to October 2020, COVID-19 patients with OD were recruited and followed over the 12-month post-infection. The following data were collected: demographic, treatments, vaccination status, and olfactory function. Olfaction was assessed with the Olfactory Disorder Questionnaire (ODQ), and threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) test. Outcomes were compared between patients of the first wave (group 1: wild/D614G virus) and the second wave (group 2: B.1.1.7. Alpha variant) at 1-, 3- and 12-month post-infection.
Results: Sixty patients completed the evaluations accounting for 33 and 27 patients in group 1 and 2, respectively. The 1-month TDI score (23.7 ± 5.3) was significantly lower in group 2 compared to group 1 (29.8 ± 8.7; p = 0.017). Proportion of normosmic patients at 1-month post-infection was significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (p = 0.009). TDI scores only significantly increased from 1- to 3-month post-infection in anosmic and hyposmic patients. Focusing on There was a negative association between the 1-month ODQ and the 1-month TDI (r[SUB]s[/SUB] = - 0.493; p = 0.012). ODQ was a significant predictor of TDI scores at 3- and 12-month post-infection. The 12-month prevalence of parosmia was 60.6% in group 1 and 42.4% in group 2, respectively. There was no significant influence of oral corticosteroid treatment, adherence to an olfactory training and vaccination status on the olfactory outcomes.
Conclusions: Patients of the second wave (Alpha B.1.1.7. variant) reported significant higher proportion of psychophysical test abnormalities at 1-month post-infection than patients infected during the first wave (D614G virus).
Keywords: Anosmia; COVID-19; Olfactory; Otolaryngology; Parosmia; Recovery; Rhinology; SARS-CoV-2; Smell; Variant.