• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis . Evaluating the serological status of COVID-19 patients using an indirect immunofluorescent assay, France

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis


. 2020 Nov 11.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04104-2. Online ahead of print.
Evaluating the serological status of COVID-19 patients using an indirect immunofluorescent assay, France


S Edouard[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], P Colson[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], C Melenotte[SUP] 1 [/SUP], F Di Pinto[SUP] 1 [/SUP], L Thomas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], B La Scola[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], M Million[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], H Tissot-Dupont[SUP] 1 [/SUP], P Gautret[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], A Stein[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], P Brouqui[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], P Parola[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], J-C Lagier[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], D Raoult[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Michel Drancourt[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

An indirect in-house immunofluorescent assay was developed in order to assess the serological status of COVID-19 patients in Marseille, France. Performance of IFA was compared to a commercial ELISA IgG kit. We tested 888 RT-qPCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients (1302 serum samples) and 350 controls including 200 sera collected before the pandemic, 64 sera known to be associated with nonspecific serological interference, 36 sera from non-coronavirus pneumonia and 50 sera from patient with other common coronavirus to elicit false-positive serology. Incorporating an inactivated clinical SARS-CoV-2 isolate as the antigen, the specificity of the assay was measured as 100% for IgA titre ≥ 1:200, 98.6% for IgM titre ≥ 1:200 and 96.3% for IgG titre ≥ 1:100 after testing a series of negative controls. IFA presented substantial agreement (86%) with ELISA EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 IgG kit (Cohen's Kappa = 0.61). The presence of antibodies was then measured at 3% before a 5-day evolution up to 47% after more than 15 days of evolution. We observed that the rates of seropositivity as well as the titre of specific antibodies were both significantly higher in patients with a poor clinical outcome than in patients with a favourable evolution. These data, which have to be integrated into the ongoing understanding of the immunological phase of the infection, suggest that detection anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is useful as a marker associated with COVID-19 severity. The IFA assay reported here is useful for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 exposure at the individual and population levels.
 
Back
Top Bottom