• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care . The global pandemic and changes in women's reproductive health: an observational study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care


. 2022 Jan 18;1-5.
doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.2024161. Online ahead of print.
The global pandemic and changes in women's reproductive health: an observational study


Liya Haile[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Niels van de Roemer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Josep Perelló Capó[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Iñaki Lete Lasa[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Silvia Vannuccini[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Martin C Koch[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Thomas Hildebrandt[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Joaquim Calaf[SUP] 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 global pandemic has led to the death of millions around the world and impacted the overall health of many people. In this article we aim to compare reproductive health indicators in the first 6 months of 2020 to the prior year, as well as explore stress and quality of life during this time.
Methods: This retrospective observational study examined the menstrual cycles of 1159 women who were using a fertility tracking device to record their menstrual cycle and BBT data. We utilised a supplemental mobile application to administer a supplemental survey to collect data on stress and quality of life. Descriptive analyses were conducted with t-tests for two-group comparisons.
Results: Study participants from 15 countries contributed to a total of 13,194 cycles. 23.1% (268/1159) responded to the survey focussed on assessing psychosocial distress. 44.4% (119/268) of the study participants reported that they had noticed a change in their menstrual cycle, temperature curve, or menstruation in the past 12 months. Cycle analysis found the average cycle length and pre-ovulation phase length was longer in the first 6 months of 2019, while the average days of menstruation was slightly longer in 2020.
Discussion: Our findings indicate that menstrual cycle indicators changed only slightly in the first 6 months of 2020 but were still statistically significant. We were also able to understand that these study participants had some level of awareness of changes to their menstrual health.

Keywords: COVID-19; Pandemic; coronavirus menstruation; fertility pandemic; menstrual cycle; reproductive health.
 
Back
Top Bottom