• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Eur J Public Health . SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on Danish mink farms and mitigating public health interventions

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur J Public Health


. 2021 Oct 8;ckab182.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab182. Online ahead of print.
SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on Danish mink farms and mitigating public health interventions


Torben Dall Schmidt[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Timo Mitze[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: First severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections on Danish mink farms were reported in June 2020 and thereupon spread geographically. We provide population-level evidence on excess human incidence rates in Danish municipalities affected by disease outbreaks on mink farms and evaluate the effectiveness of two non-pharmaceutical interventions, i.e. culling of infected mink and local lockdowns.
Methods: We use information on SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on mink farms in 94 Danish municipalities together with data on human SARS-CoV-2 cases and tested persons in weeks 24 to 51 of 2020. Difference-in-difference estimations and panel event studies for weekly human incidence rates are applied to 1) identify epidemiological trends of human SARS-CoV-2 infections associated disease outbreaks on mink farms, and 2) quantify the mitigating effects from the two non-pharmaceutical interventions.
Results: SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on mink farms in a municipality associate with increase in weekly human incidence rates by about 75%; spatial spillover effects to neighbouring municipalities are also observed. Local lockdowns reduce human incidence rates, while culling of mink appears to be more effective in combination with a lockdown. The temporal lag between an outbreak on a mink farm and a significant increase in human incidence rates is estimated to be 1-3 weeks; lockdowns and culling of mink neutralizes this effect 4-8 weeks after the initial outbreak.
Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 infections among farmed mink in Denmark significantly link to local human infection trends. Strict animal and human disease surveillance in regions with mink farming should be pursued internationally to mitigate future epidemic developments.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; difference-in-difference estimation; human infections; infected farmed mink; non-pharmaceutical interventions; public health.
 
Back
Top Bottom