tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
. 2023 Feb;27(4):1689-1694.
doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202302_31412.
Frontal QRS-T angle in patients with the suspicion of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): could it be used as a predictive gravity sign even before the diagnosis by PCR?
E Yalcinkaya[SUP] 1 [/SUP], S Dogan, E Cevik, T Cinar
Affiliations
Abstract
Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been an ongoing global public health concern, causing serious challenges in diagnosing the disease timely. We investigated the value of the frontal QRS-T (fQRS-T) angle in patients visiting the emergency department with the suspicion of COVID-19.
Patients and methods: A hundred and thirty-seven patients with the complaint of dyspnea were evaluated retrospectively. The patients with a history of coronary artery disease, heart failure, pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or using any medication such as heart rate controllers or antiarrhythmic drugs were excluded from the study. The angle between frontal QRS- and T-wave axis was defined as the fQRS-T angle, and the patients were divided into two groups based on the fQRS-T angle (group 1, <90° and group 2, ≥90°). Demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic data and rRT-PCR results were compared between the groups.
Results: The mean value of the fQRS-T angle of all participants was 45.26°. There was no significant difference between the groups according to the demographic and clinical data. Subjects with wider fQRS-T angle (group 2) had higher heart rates (p = 0.018), higher corrected QT values (p = 0.017), and higher QRS axis (p = 0.001). The patients in group 2 had a higher number of positive COVID-19 rRT-PCR test results compared to subjects with the normal fQRS-T angle (p = 0.002). In multivariate regression analysis, fQRS-T angle (p = 0.027, OR: 1.013, 95% CI: 1.001-1.024) was found as an independent variable affecting the PCR test results.
Conclusions: Prompt diagnosis, initiating preventive and protective measures in an early stage of COVID-19 are crucial. In suspected COVID-19 infection, the use of faster-resulting tests and diagnostic tools for COVID-19 allows patients to be diagnosed and treated in a timely manner for recovery, thereby optimizing patient management. Therefore, the fQRS-T angle can be used in patients with dyspnea as a part of diagnostic scores of COVID-19, even before the rRT-PCR test results and overt disease.
. 2023 Feb;27(4):1689-1694.
doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202302_31412.
Frontal QRS-T angle in patients with the suspicion of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): could it be used as a predictive gravity sign even before the diagnosis by PCR?
E Yalcinkaya[SUP] 1 [/SUP], S Dogan, E Cevik, T Cinar
Affiliations
- PMID: 36876703
- DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202302_31412
Abstract
Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been an ongoing global public health concern, causing serious challenges in diagnosing the disease timely. We investigated the value of the frontal QRS-T (fQRS-T) angle in patients visiting the emergency department with the suspicion of COVID-19.
Patients and methods: A hundred and thirty-seven patients with the complaint of dyspnea were evaluated retrospectively. The patients with a history of coronary artery disease, heart failure, pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or using any medication such as heart rate controllers or antiarrhythmic drugs were excluded from the study. The angle between frontal QRS- and T-wave axis was defined as the fQRS-T angle, and the patients were divided into two groups based on the fQRS-T angle (group 1, <90° and group 2, ≥90°). Demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic data and rRT-PCR results were compared between the groups.
Results: The mean value of the fQRS-T angle of all participants was 45.26°. There was no significant difference between the groups according to the demographic and clinical data. Subjects with wider fQRS-T angle (group 2) had higher heart rates (p = 0.018), higher corrected QT values (p = 0.017), and higher QRS axis (p = 0.001). The patients in group 2 had a higher number of positive COVID-19 rRT-PCR test results compared to subjects with the normal fQRS-T angle (p = 0.002). In multivariate regression analysis, fQRS-T angle (p = 0.027, OR: 1.013, 95% CI: 1.001-1.024) was found as an independent variable affecting the PCR test results.
Conclusions: Prompt diagnosis, initiating preventive and protective measures in an early stage of COVID-19 are crucial. In suspected COVID-19 infection, the use of faster-resulting tests and diagnostic tools for COVID-19 allows patients to be diagnosed and treated in a timely manner for recovery, thereby optimizing patient management. Therefore, the fQRS-T angle can be used in patients with dyspnea as a part of diagnostic scores of COVID-19, even before the rRT-PCR test results and overt disease.