tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Eurosurveillance, Volume 21, Issue 21, 26 May 2016
Surveillance and outbreak report
Autochthonous dengue outbreak in N?mes, South of France, July to September 2015
T Succo [SUP]1[/SUP] , I Leparc-Goffart [SUP]2[/SUP] , J Ferr? [SUP]3[/SUP] , D Roiz [SUP]4[/SUP] , B Broche [SUP]5[/SUP] , M Maquart [SUP]2[/SUP] , H Noel [SUP]6[/SUP] , O Catelinois [SUP]1[/SUP] , F Entezam [SUP]5[/SUP] , D Caire [SUP]3[/SUP] , F Jourdain [SUP]7[/SUP] , I Esteve-Moussion [SUP]5[/SUP] , A Cochet [SUP]1[/SUP] , C Paupy [SUP]4[/SUP] , C Rousseau [SUP]1[/SUP] , M Paty [SUP]6[/SUP] , F Golliot [SUP]1[/SUP]
+ Author affiliations
1. Regional office of the French Public Health Agency (Cire Languedoc-Roussillon Midi-Pyr?n?es), Montpellier, France
2. Institut de Recherche Biom?dicale des Arm?es, National Reference Laboratory for arboviruses, Marseille, France
3. Entente Interd?partementale pour la D?moustication du littoral M?diterran?en (EID M?diterran?e), Public mosquito control operator, Montpellier, France
4. Laboratory MIVEGEC (UMR 224-5290 CNRS-IRD-UM), Montpellier, France
5. Regional Health Agency of Languedoc-Roussillon Midi-Pyr?n?es, Montpellier, France
6. The French Public Health Agency (Sant? publique France), Saint-Maurice, France
7. French National Centre of Expertise on Vectors, Montpellier, France
Correspondence: Tiphanie Succo (tiphanie.succo@ars.sante.fr)
Citation style for this article: Succo T, Leparc-Goffart I, Ferr? J, Roiz D, Broche B, Maquart M, Noel H, Catelinois O, Entezam F, Caire D, Jourdain F, Esteve-Moussion I, Cochet A, Paupy C, Rousseau C, Paty M, Golliot F. Autochthonous dengue outbreak in N?mes, South of France, July to September 2015. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(21)
ii=30240. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.21.30240
Received:22 December 2015; Accepted:10 May 2016
[h=4][/h]
In August and September 2015, seven locally acquired cases of dengue virus type 1 (DENV-1) were detected in N?mes, south of France, where Aedes albopictus has been established since 2011. Epidemiological and entomological investigations allowed to steer vector control measures to contain transmission. An imported case from French Polynesia with onset fever on 4 July was identified as primary case. This outbreak occurred from 8 August to 11 September in a 300 m radius area. Six sprayings to control mosquitos were performed in the affected area. We describe the first considerable dengue outbreak in mainland France where only sporadic cases of autochthonous dengue were recorded previously (2010, 2013 and 2014). The 69 day-period between the primary case and the last autochthonous case suggests multiple episodes of mosquito infections. The absence of notification of autochthonous cases during the month following the primary case?s symptoms onset could be explained by the occurrence of inapparent illness. Recurrence of cases every year since 2013, the size of the 2015 outbreak and continuing expansion of areas with presence of Ae. albopictus highlight the threat of arboviral diseases in parts of Europe. Thus, European guidelines should be assessed and adjusted to the current context.
http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=22485
Surveillance and outbreak report
Autochthonous dengue outbreak in N?mes, South of France, July to September 2015
T Succo [SUP]1[/SUP] , I Leparc-Goffart [SUP]2[/SUP] , J Ferr? [SUP]3[/SUP] , D Roiz [SUP]4[/SUP] , B Broche [SUP]5[/SUP] , M Maquart [SUP]2[/SUP] , H Noel [SUP]6[/SUP] , O Catelinois [SUP]1[/SUP] , F Entezam [SUP]5[/SUP] , D Caire [SUP]3[/SUP] , F Jourdain [SUP]7[/SUP] , I Esteve-Moussion [SUP]5[/SUP] , A Cochet [SUP]1[/SUP] , C Paupy [SUP]4[/SUP] , C Rousseau [SUP]1[/SUP] , M Paty [SUP]6[/SUP] , F Golliot [SUP]1[/SUP]
+ Author affiliations
1. Regional office of the French Public Health Agency (Cire Languedoc-Roussillon Midi-Pyr?n?es), Montpellier, France
2. Institut de Recherche Biom?dicale des Arm?es, National Reference Laboratory for arboviruses, Marseille, France
3. Entente Interd?partementale pour la D?moustication du littoral M?diterran?en (EID M?diterran?e), Public mosquito control operator, Montpellier, France
4. Laboratory MIVEGEC (UMR 224-5290 CNRS-IRD-UM), Montpellier, France
5. Regional Health Agency of Languedoc-Roussillon Midi-Pyr?n?es, Montpellier, France
6. The French Public Health Agency (Sant? publique France), Saint-Maurice, France
7. French National Centre of Expertise on Vectors, Montpellier, France
Correspondence: Tiphanie Succo (tiphanie.succo@ars.sante.fr)
Citation style for this article: Succo T, Leparc-Goffart I, Ferr? J, Roiz D, Broche B, Maquart M, Noel H, Catelinois O, Entezam F, Caire D, Jourdain F, Esteve-Moussion I, Cochet A, Paupy C, Rousseau C, Paty M, Golliot F. Autochthonous dengue outbreak in N?mes, South of France, July to September 2015. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(21)
Received:22 December 2015; Accepted:10 May 2016
[h=4][/h]
In August and September 2015, seven locally acquired cases of dengue virus type 1 (DENV-1) were detected in N?mes, south of France, where Aedes albopictus has been established since 2011. Epidemiological and entomological investigations allowed to steer vector control measures to contain transmission. An imported case from French Polynesia with onset fever on 4 July was identified as primary case. This outbreak occurred from 8 August to 11 September in a 300 m radius area. Six sprayings to control mosquitos were performed in the affected area. We describe the first considerable dengue outbreak in mainland France where only sporadic cases of autochthonous dengue were recorded previously (2010, 2013 and 2014). The 69 day-period between the primary case and the last autochthonous case suggests multiple episodes of mosquito infections. The absence of notification of autochthonous cases during the month following the primary case?s symptoms onset could be explained by the occurrence of inapparent illness. Recurrence of cases every year since 2013, the size of the 2015 outbreak and continuing expansion of areas with presence of Ae. albopictus highlight the threat of arboviral diseases in parts of Europe. Thus, European guidelines should be assessed and adjusted to the current context.
http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=22485