• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Evaluation of saliva as diagnostic materials for influenza virus infection by PCR-based assays

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Dec 4. pii: S0009-8981(15)30075-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.12.006. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Evaluation of saliva as diagnostic materials for influenza virus infection by PCR-based assays.[/h] Sueki A[SUP]1[/SUP], Matsuda K[SUP]2[/SUP], Yamaguchi A[SUP]3[/SUP], Uehara M[SUP]3[/SUP], Sugano M[SUP]1[/SUP], Uehara T[SUP]1[/SUP], Honda T[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Immunochromatographic antigen tests have been widely used for detection of influenza virus; however its low sensitivity restricts the use of clinical materials other than nasopharyngeal swabs. Saliva is obtained non-invasively and has utility for diagnosis of influenza. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is not typically used for rapid testing because it is time consuming. We evaluated the utility of saliva as diagnostic materials for influenza virus infection by PCR-based assays.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva were simultaneously collected from 144 patients and investigated by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and droplet-RT-PCR.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Overall concordance of results from nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva were 95.8%. Influenza gene was detectable in less than 12min in saliva by the droplet-RT-PCR. Saliva as well as nasopharyngeal swabs contained more than 1?10[SUP]2[/SUP] copies/μl of the influenza gene. About half of the patients provided positive results in nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva within 24h from the onset of the symptoms.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] The study demonstrates that saliva can be used as an alternative specimen source to nasopharyngeal swabs. When rapid PCR assay including RNA extraction to be full-automation in a miniaturized machine, point-of-care test based on PCR may be realized using saliva without restriction of materials.
Copyright ? 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Droplet-RT-PCR; Influenza virus; One-step real-time RT-PCR; Rapid detection; Saliva

PMID: 26656311 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom