• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Evaluation of the Influenza Risk Reduction from Antimicrobial Spray Application on Porous Surfaces

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Risk Anal. 2017 Dec 26. doi: 10.1111/risa.12952. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Evaluation of the Influenza Risk Reduction from Antimicrobial Spray Application on Porous Surfaces.[/h] Chabrelie A[SUP]1[/SUP], Mitchell J[SUP]1[/SUP], Rose J[SUP]2[/SUP], Charbonneau D[SUP]3[/SUP], Ishida Y[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Antimicrobial spray products are used by millions of people around the world for cleaning and disinfection of commonly touched surfaces. Influenza A is a pathogen of major concern, leading to up to 49,000 deaths and 114,000 hospitalizations per year in the United States alone. One of the recognized routes of transmission for influenza A is by transfer of viruses from surfaces to hands and subsequently to mucous membranes. Therefore, routine cleaning and disinfection of surfaces is an important part of the environmental management of influenza A. While the emphasis is generally on spraying hard surfaces and laundering cloth and linens with high temperature machine drying, not all surfaces can be treated in this manner. The quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) approach was used to develop a stochastic risk model for estimating the risk of infection from indirect contact with porous fomite with and without surface treatment with an antimicrobial spray. The data collected from laboratory analysis combined with the risk model show that influenza A infection risk can be lowered by four logs after using an antimicrobial spray on a porous surface. Median risk associated with a single touch to a contaminated fabric was estimated to be 1.25 ? 10[SUP]-4[/SUP] for the untreated surface, and 3.6 ? 10[SUP]-8[/SUP] for the treated surface as a base case assumption. This single touch scenario was used to develop a generalizable model for estimating risks and comparing scenarios with and without treatment to more realistic multiple touch scenarios over time periods and with contact rates previously reported in the literature. The results of this study and understanding of product efficacy on risk reduction inform and broaden the range of risk management strategies for influenza A by demonstrating effective risk reduction associated with treating nonporous fomites that cannot be laundered at high temperatures.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Antimicrobial spray; QMRA; fabric; fomite; influenza A; porous; transfer

PMID: 29278668 DOI: 10.1111/risa.12952
 
Back
Top Bottom