• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Expert Rev Vaccines . Cost-effectiveness of cell-based influenza vaccine in France

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines


. 2024 Oct 16.
doi: 10.1080/14760584.2024.2417854. Online ahead of print. Cost-effectiveness of cell-based influenza vaccine in France

Gaetan Gavazzi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marc Paccalin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Quentin Berkovitch[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Henri Leleu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Romain Moreau[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Emanuele Ciglia[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nansa Burlet[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Joaquin Mould-Quevedo[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Objectives: Annually in France, influenza results in over one million GP consultations, around 20,000 hospitalizations, and approximately 9,000 deaths. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) for those under 65, which enhances effectiveness avoiding egg-adaptation, compared to egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVe).
Methods: An age-structured susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) transmission model, calibrated to represent an average influenza season based on French data from 2011 to 2019, integrates a contact matrix estimating intergroup contact rates. Evaluating epidemiological, economic and utility outcomes, the model includes vaccine effectiveness and medical costs from the existing literature and French national data. Adjustments to quality of life due to infection and hospitalization are also included. Uncertainty is explored through scenario and sensitivity analyses.
Results: Compared to QIVe, QIVc significantly reduces healthcare utilization and mortality, preventing 49,946 GP consultations, 1,087 hospitalizations, and 231 deaths in France. Despite an initial investment of 7.6 million euros, QIVc achieves a net saving of 12 million euros in healthcare expenditures, making it a dominant cost-saving strategy. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicate dominance in 78% of 10,000 simulations.
Conclusions: Introducing cell-based influenza vaccines in the French immunization program prevents influenza cases, hospitalizations, death, while reducing costs versus egg-based influenza vaccines.

Keywords: Influenza; cell-based vaccine; cost-effectiveness; egg-based vaccine; public health; relative effectiveness; vaccination campaign.

 
Back
Top Bottom