• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Expert Rev Vaccines . Enhancing influenza vaccination uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention strategies

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines


. 2025 Dec;24(1):17-27.
doi: 10.1080/14760584.2025.2550986. Epub 2025 Aug 23. Enhancing influenza vaccination uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention strategies

YuNing Wang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], YaZhen Zhang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], JiaYu Wang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], NaiYang Shi[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], HuaJie Jin[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hui Jin[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Introduction: Despite extensive efforts, global influenza vaccination rates remain suboptimal, particularly among high-risk populations.
Research design and methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search up to April 2023. Experimental studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions on influenza vaccination uptake were included, expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Random-effects meta-analysis models were utilized for pooled estimates, with heterogeneity assessed through I[SUP]2[/SUP]. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed.
Results: This meta-analysis includes 180 studies involving 2,390,119 participants and comprehensively evaluates the effectiveness of recipient-, provider-, health system-based, and multitarget interventions. Overall, interventions significantly increased vaccination rates, with a pooled RR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.21 to 1.32). Notably, provider-based interventions were more effective for healthcare workers (RR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.46 to 1.66), whereas recipient-based interventions were more efficacious for pregnant women (RR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.85). Multitarget strategies were the most effective among older adults (RR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.72) and population under age of 18 (RR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.90).
Conclusions: These findings provide critical insights for optimizing public health strategies, underscoring the need for innovative and tailored approaches to enhance global vaccination uptake.

Keywords: Influenza; different populations; framework; intervention; vaccine.

 
Back
Top Bottom