tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
F S Rep
. 2021 Apr 28;2(2):209-214.
doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.04.005. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Incidence of first trimester pregnancy loss in the infertile population during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in New York City
Pietro Bortoletto[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Phillip A Romanski[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joshua Stewart[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zev Rosenwaks[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samantha M Pfeifer[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objective: To describe the incidence of first trimester clinical pregnancy loss in the infertile population during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.
Design: Web-based cross-sectional survey.
Setting: New York City-based academic reproductive medicine practice.
Patients: A total of 305 infertile patients with a confirmed intrauterine pregnancy in their first trimester between December 1, 2019, and April 1, 2020, were matched by age and treatment type to pregnant patients from the year prior.
Interventions: None.
Main outcome measures: First trimester clinical pregnancy loss rate.
Results: In total, the first trimester pregnancy loss rate was lower in the COVID-19 era cohort compared with that in the pre-COVID-19 era cohort (11.9% vs. 20.1%). There was no difference between cohorts in the pregnancy loss rate of women conceiving via fresh embryo transfer (19.6% vs. 24.4%) or via frozen embryo transfer with preimplantation genetic testing (5.4% vs. 9.5%,). In women conceiving via frozen embryo transfer without preimplantation genetic testing, the pregnancy loss rate was statistically lower in the COVID-19 group (12.5% vs. 24.5%). There was no difference in the pregnancy loss rate by treatment type when stratifying by COVID-19 testing or symptom status. Of the 40 (13.1%) patients with a pregnancy loss, there was no difference in self-reported COVID-19 symptoms or symptom type compared with results in those who did not experience a pregnancy loss.
Conclusion: Despite patients expressing significant worry about COVID-19 and pregnancy, our data provides reassuring information that the first trimester pregnancy loss rate is not elevated for women conceiving via assisted reproductive technology during the global COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords: COVID-19; assisted reproduction; first trimester pregnancy loss; miscarriage; pandemic.
. 2021 Apr 28;2(2):209-214.
doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.04.005. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Incidence of first trimester pregnancy loss in the infertile population during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in New York City
Pietro Bortoletto[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Phillip A Romanski[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joshua Stewart[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zev Rosenwaks[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samantha M Pfeifer[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34278356
- PMCID: PMC8267398
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.04.005
Abstract
Objective: To describe the incidence of first trimester clinical pregnancy loss in the infertile population during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City.
Design: Web-based cross-sectional survey.
Setting: New York City-based academic reproductive medicine practice.
Patients: A total of 305 infertile patients with a confirmed intrauterine pregnancy in their first trimester between December 1, 2019, and April 1, 2020, were matched by age and treatment type to pregnant patients from the year prior.
Interventions: None.
Main outcome measures: First trimester clinical pregnancy loss rate.
Results: In total, the first trimester pregnancy loss rate was lower in the COVID-19 era cohort compared with that in the pre-COVID-19 era cohort (11.9% vs. 20.1%). There was no difference between cohorts in the pregnancy loss rate of women conceiving via fresh embryo transfer (19.6% vs. 24.4%) or via frozen embryo transfer with preimplantation genetic testing (5.4% vs. 9.5%,). In women conceiving via frozen embryo transfer without preimplantation genetic testing, the pregnancy loss rate was statistically lower in the COVID-19 group (12.5% vs. 24.5%). There was no difference in the pregnancy loss rate by treatment type when stratifying by COVID-19 testing or symptom status. Of the 40 (13.1%) patients with a pregnancy loss, there was no difference in self-reported COVID-19 symptoms or symptom type compared with results in those who did not experience a pregnancy loss.
Conclusion: Despite patients expressing significant worry about COVID-19 and pregnancy, our data provides reassuring information that the first trimester pregnancy loss rate is not elevated for women conceiving via assisted reproductive technology during the global COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords: COVID-19; assisted reproduction; first trimester pregnancy loss; miscarriage; pandemic.