• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Forecasting influenza in Hong Kong with Google search queries and statistical model fusion

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One. 2017 May 2;12(5):e0176690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176690. eCollection 2017.
[h=1]Forecasting influenza in Hong Kong with Google search queries and statistical model fusion.[/h] Xu Q[SUP]1[/SUP], Gel YR[SUP]2[/SUP], Ramirez Ramirez LL[SUP]3[/SUP], Nezafati K[SUP]2[/SUP], Zhang Q[SUP]1[/SUP], Tsui KL[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] The objective of this study is to investigate predictive utility of online social media and web search queries, particularly, Google search data, to forecast new cases of influenza-like-illness (ILI) in general outpatient clinics (GOPC) in Hong Kong. To mitigate the impact of sensitivity to self-excitement (i.e., fickle media interest) and other artifacts of online social media data, in our approach we fuse multiple offline and online data sources.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Four individual models: generalized linear model (GLM), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and deep learning (DL) with Feedforward Neural Networks (FNN) are employed to forecast ILI-GOPC both one week and two weeks in advance. The covariates include Google search queries, meteorological data, and previously recorded offline ILI. To our knowledge, this is the first study that introduces deep learning methodology into surveillance of infectious diseases and investigates its predictive utility. Furthermore, to exploit the strength from each individual forecasting models, we use statistical model fusion, using Bayesian model averaging (BMA), which allows a systematic integration of multiple forecast scenarios. For each model, an adaptive approach is used to capture the recent relationship between ILI and covariates.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] DL with FNN appears to deliver the most competitive predictive performance among the four considered individual models. Combing all four models in a comprehensive BMA framework allows to further improve such predictive evaluation metrics as root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute predictive error (MAPE). Nevertheless, DL with FNN remains the preferred method for predicting locations of influenza peaks.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] The proposed approach can be viewed a feasible alternative to forecast ILI in Hong Kong or other countries where ILI has no constant seasonal trend and influenza data resources are limited. The proposed methodology is easily tractable and computationally efficient.


PMID: 28464015 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176690
Free full text
 
Tracking google searches for flu is not an accurate method to predict flu. This is why after 10+ years the google flu trends program was abandoned. Every year the predictions missed the actuals. Also every year the modelers adjusted the program to more refine the equations - and to no avail.

I think the most accurate method is actual emergency room visits + a multiplier.
 
Back
Top Bottom