• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Med (Lausanne) . Priorities Towards Fair Allocation of Ventilators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Delphi Study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Med (Lausanne)


. 2022 Jan 24;8:769508.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.769508. eCollection 2021.
Priorities Towards Fair Allocation of Ventilators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Delphi Study


Seyyed-Hadi Ghamari[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mohsen Abbasi-Kangevari[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nasim Zamani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ali-Asghar Kolahi[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in severe shortage in vital resources, including invasive mechanical ventilators. The current imbalance between demand and supply of mechanical ventilators has called for investigations on the fair allocation of mechanical ventilators.
Objective: To determine the priorities of the medical experts towards the fair allocation of ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: This study was conducted from May 28 to Aug 20, 2020. The questionnaire was sent to 50 medical specialists as the Delphi panel. Participants were asked to rate each prioritising factor: "-1" for low priority, "+1" for high priority, and "Zero" for equal priority.
Results: Among 38 experts who responded to the email, the responses of 35 were analysed. 31 (88.6%) participants recommended that pregnant women be considered high priority in allocating ventilators, 27 (77.1%) mothers of children <5 years, 26 (74.3%) patients under 80-years, and 23 (65.7%) front-line-healthcare-workers. In contrast, 28 (80.0) participants recommended that patients who are terminally ill should be considered as a low priority, 27 (77.1%) patients with active-malignancy, 25 (71.4%) neurodegenerative diseases, and 16 (45.7%) patients aged >80. The panel did not reach a consensus regarding the role of patients' laboratory profiles, underlying diseases, or drug abuse in the prioritisation of ventilators.
Conclusions: The panel considered pregnant mothers, mothers of children under 5 years, age groups younger than 80, and front-line healthcare workers to have high priority in allocating mechanical ventilators.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus infections; ethics; health care rationing; health policy; mechanical ventilators; resource allocation.
 
Back
Top Bottom