• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Front Microbiol . Aerosolization effects on coronavirus infectivity

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Microbiol


. 2026 Feb 20:17:1764341.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1764341. eCollection 2026.
Aerosolization effects on coronavirus infectivity

Meiyi Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gabriel L Hamer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Maria D King[SUP] 1 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Understanding the airborne persistence of coronaviruses is critical for effective infection control, yet the effects of aerosolization and airborne suspension on viral infectivity remain poorly defined. In this study, we used bovine coronavirus (BCoV) as a surrogate for human Betacoronaviruses to evaluate how nebulization, aerosolization time, and continuous air mixing affect virus viability and RNA persistence. BCoV suspensions were aerosolized in a sealed, propeller-mixed chamber using a Collison nebulizer for 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min. Aerosols were collected using a Wetted Wall Cyclone (WWC), and post-nebulization suspension from the nebulizer reservoir and original stock were analyzed. Infectivity was quantified by TCID[SUB]50[/SUB] assay on MDBK cells, and viral RNA was measured by qRT-PCR. Stock and nebulized suspensions retained stable infectivity, indicating that the mechanical forces of nebulization did not impair viral viability. In contrast, WWC-collected aerosols showed a time-dependent infectivity decline. Viral RNA in aerosols remained comparatively stable, whereas RNA levels in the nebulizer reservoir dropped during the first 5 min of nebulization and then remained constant. Temperature and relative humidity in the chamber during the tests showed only minor fluctuations. These findings showed minimal loss of BCoV viability in suspensions during nebulization and significant inactivation at prolonged air mixing, while RNA levels persist. The pronounced infectivity loss under continuous air mixing highlights the role of mechanical stresses in compromising airborne coronavirus viability, a factor directly relevant to indoor environments where HVAC systems and fans are commonly used. The findings of this study help inform risk mitigation strategies in real-world settings.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; aerosolization; aerosols; bovine coronavirus; nebulization; virus infectivity.

 
Back
Top Bottom