tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Front Public Health
. 2022 Jan 18;9:831220.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.831220. eCollection 2021.
The World Health Organization's Actions Within the United Nations System to Facilitate a Whole-of-Society Response to COVID-19 at Country Level
Gina Samaan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michelle McPherson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Johan Eidman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Offeibea Obubah[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jean-Pierre Baptiste[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Lianne Kuppens[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Kai Von Harbou[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Miftahul Fahmi Sembiring[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Shambhu Acharya[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Peter Graaff[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted that managing health emergencies requires more than an effective health response, but that operationalizing a whole-of-society approach is challenging. The World Health Organization (WHO), as the lead agency for health within the United Nations (UN), led the UN response at the global level through the Crisis Management Team, and at the country level through the UN Country Teams (UNCTs) in accordance with its mandate. Three case studies-Mali, Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh, and Uzbekistan-provide examples of how WHO contributed to the whole-of-society response for COVID-19 at the country level. Interviews with WHO staff, supplemented by internal and external published reports, highlighted that the action of WHO comprised technical expertise to ensure an effective whole-of-society response and to minimize social disruption, including those affecting peacekeeping in Mali, livelihood sectors in Cox's Bazar, and the education sector in Uzbekistan. Leveraging local level volunteers from various sectors led to both a stronger public health response and the continuation of other sectoral work. Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) emerged as a key theme for UN engagement at country level. These collective efforts of operationalizing whole-of-society response at the country level need to continue for the COVID-19 response, but also in preparedness for other health and non-health emergencies. Building resilience for future emergencies requires developing and exercising multi-sectoral preparedness plans and benefits from collective UN support to countries. Coronavirus disease had many impacts outside of health, and therefore emergency preparedness needs to occur outside of health too.
Keywords: COVID-19; United Nations; World Health Organization; country; pandemic; response; whole-of-society.
. 2022 Jan 18;9:831220.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.831220. eCollection 2021.
The World Health Organization's Actions Within the United Nations System to Facilitate a Whole-of-Society Response to COVID-19 at Country Level
Gina Samaan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michelle McPherson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Johan Eidman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Offeibea Obubah[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jean-Pierre Baptiste[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Lianne Kuppens[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Kai Von Harbou[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Miftahul Fahmi Sembiring[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Shambhu Acharya[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Peter Graaff[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35118047
- PMCID: PMC8804283
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.831220
Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted that managing health emergencies requires more than an effective health response, but that operationalizing a whole-of-society approach is challenging. The World Health Organization (WHO), as the lead agency for health within the United Nations (UN), led the UN response at the global level through the Crisis Management Team, and at the country level through the UN Country Teams (UNCTs) in accordance with its mandate. Three case studies-Mali, Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh, and Uzbekistan-provide examples of how WHO contributed to the whole-of-society response for COVID-19 at the country level. Interviews with WHO staff, supplemented by internal and external published reports, highlighted that the action of WHO comprised technical expertise to ensure an effective whole-of-society response and to minimize social disruption, including those affecting peacekeeping in Mali, livelihood sectors in Cox's Bazar, and the education sector in Uzbekistan. Leveraging local level volunteers from various sectors led to both a stronger public health response and the continuation of other sectoral work. Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) emerged as a key theme for UN engagement at country level. These collective efforts of operationalizing whole-of-society response at the country level need to continue for the COVID-19 response, but also in preparedness for other health and non-health emergencies. Building resilience for future emergencies requires developing and exercising multi-sectoral preparedness plans and benefits from collective UN support to countries. Coronavirus disease had many impacts outside of health, and therefore emergency preparedness needs to occur outside of health too.
Keywords: COVID-19; United Nations; World Health Organization; country; pandemic; response; whole-of-society.