• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Genes Genomics . Diagnostic evaluation of qRT-PCR-based kit and dPCR-based kit for COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Genes Genomics


. 2021 Sep 15.
doi: 10.1007/s13258-021-01162-4. Online ahead of print.
Diagnostic evaluation of qRT-PCR-based kit and dPCR-based kit for COVID-19


Cherl-Joon Lee[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wonseok Shin[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 2 [/SUP], Seyoung Mun[SUP] 3 4 5 [/SUP], Minjae Yu[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Young-Bong Choi[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Dong Hee Kim[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Kyudong Han[SUP] 9 10 11 12 13 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) is well known as a fatal disease, first discovered at Wuhan in China, ranging from mild to death, such as shortness of breath and fever. Early diagnosis of COVID-19 is a crucial point in preventing global prevalence.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic competency and efficiency with the Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay kit and the Dr. PCR 20 K COVID-19 Detection kit, designed based on the qRT-PCR and dPCR technologies, respectively.
Methods: A total of 30 negative and 20 COVID-19 positive specimens were assigned to the diagnostic test by using different COVID-19 diagnosis kits. Diagnostic accuracy was measured by statistical testing with sensitivity, specificity, and co-efficiency calculations.
Results: Comparing both diagnostic kits, we confirmed that the diagnostic results of 30 negative and 20 positive cases were the same pre-diagnostic results. The diagnostic statistics test results were perfectly matched with value (1). Cohen's Kappa coefficient was demonstrated that the given kits in two different ways were "almost perfect" with value (1). In evaluating the detection capability, the dilutional linearity experiments substantiate that the Dr. PCR 20 K COVID-19 Detection kit could detect SARS-CoV-2 viral load at a concentration ten times lower than that of the Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay kit.
Conclusions: In this study, we propose that the dPCR diagnosis using LOAA dPCR could be a powerful method for COVID-19 point-of-care tests requiring immediate diagnosis in a limited time and space through the advantages of relatively low sample concentration and small equipment size compared to conventional qRT-PCR.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease of 2019; Digital PCR; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; quantitative real-time PCR.
 
Back
Top Bottom