• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Glob Public Health. YouTube as a source of medical information on the novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Glob Public Health. 2020 May 12:1-8. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1761426. [Epub ahead of print]
YouTube as a source of medical information on the novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic.


D'Souza RS[SUP]1[/SUP], D'Souza S[SUP]2[/SUP], Strand N[SUP]1[/SUP], Anderson A[SUP]1[/SUP], Vogt MNP[SUP]1[/SUP], Olatoye O[SUP]1[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

Media coverage on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been extensive, yet large gaps remain in our understanding of the role of social media platforms during worldwide health crisis. The purpose of this study was to assess the most viewed YouTube videos on COVID-19 for medical content. We coded video characteristics, source, and medical content of the 113 most-widely viewed videos about COVID-19. Seventy-nine (69.9%) videos were classified as useful, and 10 (8.8%) videos were classified as misleading. Independent users were more likely to post misleading videos than useful videos (60.0% vs 21.5%, P =0.009). News agencies were more likely to post useful videos than misleading videos (72.2% vs 40.0%, P =0.039). Useful videos were more likely to present any information on prevalence or incidence (79.7% vs 20.0%, P <0.001), as well as information on outcomes or prognosis (84.8% vs 30.0%, P <0.001) compared to misleading videos. The World Health Organization contributed one useful video (1.3%), while no videos from the Center for Disease Control were included. Although YouTube generally is a useful source of medical information on the COVID-19 pandemic, increased efforts to disseminate accurate information from reputable sources is desired to help mitigate disease spread and decrease unnecessary panic in the general population.



KEYWORDS:

COVID-19; communication; disease outbreaks; information dissemination; internet; public health; social media


PMID:32397870DOI:10.1080/17441692.2020.1761426
 
Back
Top Bottom