• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Health care workers-part of the system or part of the public? Ambivalent risk perception in health care workers

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Jun 14. pii: S0196-6553(14)00660-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.04.012. [Epub ahead of print]
Health care workers-part of the system or part of the public? Ambivalent risk perception in health care workers.
Gesser-Edelsburg A1, Walter N2, Green MS3.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

The emergence of the avian influenza A (H7N9) in China during 2013 illustrates the importance of health care professionals as a mediating channel between health agencies and the public. Our study examined health care professionals' risk perceptions considering their unique position as representing the health care system and yet also being part of the public, hence a risk group. Recent studies have examined the role of health professionals' personal risk perceptions and attitudes regarding compliance of the general public with vaccination. Our study examined how risk perception affects their risk analysis.
METHODS:

We employed an online survey of Israeli health care professionals and the general public in Israel (N = 240).
RESULTS:

When risk perception is relatively low, health care professionals tend to base their attitudes toward vaccines on analytical knowledge (Rc = 0.315; P < .05), whereas in situations with high risk perception, the results did not indicate any significant difference between Israeli health professionals and the Israeli general public, hence both groups base their attitudes more on emotions and personal experience than on analytical knowledge.
CONCLUSIONS:

Public health organizations must consider the fact that health professionals are a group that cannot be automatically treated as an extension of the organization. When the risk is tangible and relevant, health care workers behave and act like everybody else. Our study contributes to understanding health care professionals' perceptions about vaccines and the thinking processes underlying such perceptions.

Copyright ? 2014 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS:

Analytical knowledge; Compliance; Emotions and personal experience; H7N9; Vaccination

PMID:
24939516
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24939516
 
Back
Top Bottom