tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 9;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0080-7.
[h=1]Human temperatures for syndromic surveillance in the emergency department: data from the autumn wave of the 2009 swine flu (H1N1) pandemic and a seasonal influenza outbreak.[/h] Bordonaro SF[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], McGillicuddy DC[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Pompei F[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Burmistrov D[SUP]8[/SUP], Harding C[SUP]9[/SUP], Sanchez LD[SUP]10,[/SUP][SUP]11[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] The emergency department (ED) increasingly acts as a gateway to the evaluation and treatment of acute illnesses. Consequently, it has also become a key testing ground for systems that monitor and identify outbreaks of disease. Here, we describe a new technology that automatically collects body temperatures during triage. The technology was tested in an ED as an approach to monitoring diseases that cause fever, such as seasonal flu and some pandemics.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Temporal artery thermometers that log temperature measurements were placed in a Boston ED and used for initial triage vital signs. Time-stamped measurements were collected from the thermometers to investigate the performance a real-time system would offer. The data were summarized in terms of rates of fever (temperatures ≥100.4 ?F [≥38.0 ?C]) and were qualitatively compared with regional disease surveillance programs in Massachusetts.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] From September 2009 through August 2011, 71,865 body temperatures were collected and included in our analysis, 2073 (2.6 %) of which were fevers. The period of study included the autumn-winter wave of the 2009-2010 H1N1 (swine flu) pandemic, during which the weekly incidence of fever reached a maximum of 5.6 %, as well as the 2010-2011 seasonal flu outbreak, during which the maximum weekly incidence of fever was 6.6 %. The periods of peak fever rates corresponded with the periods of regionally elevated flu activity.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Temperature measurements were monitored at triage in the ED over a period of 2 years. The resulting data showed promise as a potential surveillance tool for febrile disease that could complement current disease surveillance systems. Because temperature can easily be measured by non-experts, it might also be suitable for monitoring febrile disease activity in schools, workplaces, and transportation hubs, where many traditional syndromic indicators are impractical. However, the system's validity and generalizability should be evaluated in additional years and settings.
PMID: 26961277 [PubMed - in process] Free full text
[h=1]Human temperatures for syndromic surveillance in the emergency department: data from the autumn wave of the 2009 swine flu (H1N1) pandemic and a seasonal influenza outbreak.[/h] Bordonaro SF[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], McGillicuddy DC[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Pompei F[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Burmistrov D[SUP]8[/SUP], Harding C[SUP]9[/SUP], Sanchez LD[SUP]10,[/SUP][SUP]11[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] The emergency department (ED) increasingly acts as a gateway to the evaluation and treatment of acute illnesses. Consequently, it has also become a key testing ground for systems that monitor and identify outbreaks of disease. Here, we describe a new technology that automatically collects body temperatures during triage. The technology was tested in an ED as an approach to monitoring diseases that cause fever, such as seasonal flu and some pandemics.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Temporal artery thermometers that log temperature measurements were placed in a Boston ED and used for initial triage vital signs. Time-stamped measurements were collected from the thermometers to investigate the performance a real-time system would offer. The data were summarized in terms of rates of fever (temperatures ≥100.4 ?F [≥38.0 ?C]) and were qualitatively compared with regional disease surveillance programs in Massachusetts.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] From September 2009 through August 2011, 71,865 body temperatures were collected and included in our analysis, 2073 (2.6 %) of which were fevers. The period of study included the autumn-winter wave of the 2009-2010 H1N1 (swine flu) pandemic, during which the weekly incidence of fever reached a maximum of 5.6 %, as well as the 2010-2011 seasonal flu outbreak, during which the maximum weekly incidence of fever was 6.6 %. The periods of peak fever rates corresponded with the periods of regionally elevated flu activity.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Temperature measurements were monitored at triage in the ED over a period of 2 years. The resulting data showed promise as a potential surveillance tool for febrile disease that could complement current disease surveillance systems. Because temperature can easily be measured by non-experts, it might also be suitable for monitoring febrile disease activity in schools, workplaces, and transportation hubs, where many traditional syndromic indicators are impractical. However, the system's validity and generalizability should be evaluated in additional years and settings.
PMID: 26961277 [PubMed - in process] Free full text