tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Immun Inflamm Dis
. 2023 Apr;11(4):e806.
doi: 10.1002/iid3.806. The comparison of clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with COVID-19: A case-control study
Ladan Abasian[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fatemeh Jafari[SUP] 1 [/SUP], SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Niloofar Ayoobi Yazdi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Morteza Daraei[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nasrin Ahmadinejad[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Fereshteh Ghiasvand[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hosein Khalili[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Arash Seifi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mohsen Maydani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Farzane Behnezhad[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Zahra Ahmadinejad[SUP] 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with significant morbidity and mortality. We reported and compared the clinical and para-clinical findings of immunocompromised and immunocompetent COVID-19 patients in a case-control study at the Imam Khomeini hospital in Tehran, Iran.
Methods: In this study, 107 immunocompromised COVID-19 patients were recruited as the case group, and 107 immunocompetent COVID-19 patients as the control group. The participants were matched based on age and sex. The patients' information was retrieved from the hospital records in an information sheet. Associations between clinical and para-clinical findings with the immune status were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: The initial pulse rate and recovery time were significantly higher in immunocompromised patients (p < .05). Myalgia, nausea/vomiting, loss of appetite, headache, and dizziness were more frequently reported by the control group (p < .05). Regarding the prescribed medications' duration, Sofosbovir was used longer in the case group, while Ribavirin was used longer in the control groups (p < .05). The most common complication in the case group was acute respiratory distress syndrome, although no major complications were observed in the control group. According to the multivariate analysis, recovery time and Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra) prescription were significantly higher in the immunocompromised compared to the immunocompetent group.
Conclusion: Recovery time was significantly longer in the immunocompromised compared to the immunocompetent group, which emphasizes the necessity of prolonged care in these high-risk patients. Also, it is recommended to investigate the effect of novel therapeutic interventions to reduce the recovery time in addition to improving the prognosis of immunodeficient patients with COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; clinical presentation; immunosuppression; laboratory/radiological findings.
. 2023 Apr;11(4):e806.
doi: 10.1002/iid3.806. The comparison of clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with COVID-19: A case-control study
Ladan Abasian[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fatemeh Jafari[SUP] 1 [/SUP], SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Niloofar Ayoobi Yazdi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Morteza Daraei[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Nasrin Ahmadinejad[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Fereshteh Ghiasvand[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hosein Khalili[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Arash Seifi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mohsen Maydani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Farzane Behnezhad[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Zahra Ahmadinejad[SUP] 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37102662
- DOI: 10.1002/iid3.806
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with significant morbidity and mortality. We reported and compared the clinical and para-clinical findings of immunocompromised and immunocompetent COVID-19 patients in a case-control study at the Imam Khomeini hospital in Tehran, Iran.
Methods: In this study, 107 immunocompromised COVID-19 patients were recruited as the case group, and 107 immunocompetent COVID-19 patients as the control group. The participants were matched based on age and sex. The patients' information was retrieved from the hospital records in an information sheet. Associations between clinical and para-clinical findings with the immune status were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: The initial pulse rate and recovery time were significantly higher in immunocompromised patients (p < .05). Myalgia, nausea/vomiting, loss of appetite, headache, and dizziness were more frequently reported by the control group (p < .05). Regarding the prescribed medications' duration, Sofosbovir was used longer in the case group, while Ribavirin was used longer in the control groups (p < .05). The most common complication in the case group was acute respiratory distress syndrome, although no major complications were observed in the control group. According to the multivariate analysis, recovery time and Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra) prescription were significantly higher in the immunocompromised compared to the immunocompetent group.
Conclusion: Recovery time was significantly longer in the immunocompromised compared to the immunocompetent group, which emphasizes the necessity of prolonged care in these high-risk patients. Also, it is recommended to investigate the effect of novel therapeutic interventions to reduce the recovery time in addition to improving the prognosis of immunodeficient patients with COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; clinical presentation; immunosuppression; laboratory/radiological findings.