• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Immunogenicity and safety of a novel seasonal influenza preservative-free vaccine manufactured in Kazakhstan: Results of a, comparative, phase II clin

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Nov 7:0. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1387345. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Immunogenicity and safety of a novel seasonal influenza preservative-free vaccine manufactured in Kazakhstan: Results of a, comparative, phase II clinical trial in adults.[/h] Sarsenbayeva G[SUP]1[/SUP], Volgin Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Kassenov M[SUP]1[/SUP], Issagulov T[SUP]1[/SUP], Bogdanov N[SUP]1[/SUP], Sansyzbay A[SUP]1[/SUP], Stukova M[SUP]2[/SUP], Buzitskaya Z[SUP]2[/SUP], Кulmagambetov I[SUP]3[/SUP], Davlyatshin T[SUP]4[/SUP], Khairullin B[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] The study was aimed at comparative evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccine RIBSP versus commercial vaccine VAXIGRIP? for immunogenicity and safety in the course of clinical trial phase II on healthy volunteers aged 18-60 years.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] The trial involved 150 subjects in randomized 2:1 groups that received either RIBSP vaccine or comparator vaccine VAXIGRIP?. One dose (0.5 ml) of either vaccine contained 15 μg of hemagglutinin of each influenza virus strain recommended by WHO for the Northern hemisphere in 2016-2017 flu season. The observation period lasted 21 day. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT 03016143.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Assessment of immunogenic activity of the vaccine under study showed that in 21 day the portion of participants with 4-fold seroconversions was 87.0% to А/H1N1; 63.0% to А/H3N2 and 59.0% to B virus. Antibody titer increase factor in the group of subjects that received RIBSP vaccine was 23.3 for А/H1N1; 4.4 for А/H3N2 and 4.5 for B virus. The volunteers that received RIBSP vaccine demonstrated 95% seroprotection level against А/H1N1; 84% against А/H3N2 and 80% against B virus. RIBSP vaccine met the CHMP criteria of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CPMP/BWP/214/96). In the course of evaluating the vaccine safety no serious undesirable effects were recorded. All changes of laboratory data were slight and single in most cases. All recorded local reactions have been light in character and these have been predicted reactions observed at vaccination against influenza.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Comparison of the allantoic inactivated split vaccine obtained in vaccines RIBSP and VAXIGRIP?, showed similar immunogenic activity. Both vaccines were safe for the study participants.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Influenza; immune responses; phase II trial; safety; seasonal; vaccine

PMID: 29112488 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1387345
 
Back
Top Bottom