• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Impact of Fever and Antipyretic Use on Influenza Vaccine Immune Reponses in Children

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Feb 19. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001949. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Impact of Fever and Antipyretic Use on Influenza Vaccine Immune Reponses in Children.[/h] Li-Kim-Moy J, Wood N, Jones C, Macartney K, Booy R.
[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Comparing post-vaccination fever rates in pediatric influenza vaccine clinical trials is difficult due to variability in how fever is reported. The impact of vaccine-related fever and antipyretic use on trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) immunogenicity in children is also unclear.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] In this pilot study, we obtained individual-level data provided by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) from three pediatric clinical trials of GSK versus comparator TIV. We explored a primary study (NCT00764790), the largest trial involving young children (6-35 months, n=3317), and further explored key findings in the two other trials (3-17 years, NCT00980005; 6m-17y NCT00383123). We analyzed post-vaccination fever and antipyretic use, and their association with immunogenicity through use of multivariable regression.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Post-vaccination fever data were re-analyzed from the primary study using the Brighton Collaboration standardized definition (vaccine-related fever ≥38?C, measured by any route, reported after each dose). Rates were substantially lower after first (2.7-3.4%) and second doses (3.3-4.1%), than those published (6.2-6.6%; combined dose data, any causality). A pooled immunogenicity analysis combining the 3 studies (n=5902) revealed children with post-vaccination fever had significantly higher adjusted Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) than those without fever (ratio 1.21-1.39; p≤0.01). Conversely those with antipyretic use had significantly lower adjusted GMTs (ratio 0.80-0.87; p<0.0006), dependent on virus strain.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Varying analyses and reporting methods can result in substantially different reported fever rates in studies. Standardized reporting of fever is needed to facilitate comparison between studies. Fever and antipyretic use may have important associations with influenza vaccine immunogenicity in children and need further prospective investigation.


PMID: 29465480 DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001949
 
Back
Top Bottom