• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol . Bacterial coinfection in influenza pneumonia: Rates, pathogens, and outcomes

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol


. 2021 Apr 23;1-6.
doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.96. Online ahead of print.
Bacterial coinfection in influenza pneumonia: Rates, pathogens, and outcomes


Patricia S Bartley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Abhishek Deshpande[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Pei-Chun Yu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Michael Klompas[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Sarah D Haessler[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Peter B Imrey[SUP] 3 7 [/SUP], Marya D Zilberberg[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Michael B Rothberg[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Evidence from pandemics suggests that influenza is often associated with bacterial coinfection. Among patients hospitalized for influenza pneumonia, we report the rate of coinfection and distribution of pathogens, and we compare outcomes of patients with and without bacterial coinfection.
Methods: We included adults admitted with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and tested for influenza from 2010 to 2015 at 179 US hospitals participating in the Premier database. Pneumonia was identified using an International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) algorithm. We used multiple logistic and gamma-generalized linear mixed models to assess the relationships between coinfection and inpatient mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of stay, and cost.
Results: Among 38,665 patients hospitalized with CAP and tested for influenza, 4,313 (11.2%) were positive. In the first 3 hospital days, patients with influenza were less likely than those without to have a positive culture (10.3% vs 16.2%; P < .001), and cultures were more likely to contain Staphylococcus aureus (34.2% vs 28.2%; P = .007) and less likely to contain Streptococcus pneumoniae (24.9% vs 31.0%; P = .008). Of S. aureus isolates, 42.8% were methicillin resistant among influenza patients versus 53.2% among those without influenza (P = .01). After hospital day 3, pathogens for both groups were similar. Bacterial coinfection was associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.17-4.16), late ICU transfer (aOR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.98-4.04), and higher cost (risk-adjusted mean multiplier, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.59-1.96).
Conclusions: In a large US inpatient sample hospitalized with influenza and CAP, S. aureus was the most frequent cause of bacterial coinfection. Coinfection was associated with worse outcomes and higher costs.
 
Back
Top Bottom