• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Infect Dis (Lond) . Post-outbreak serological screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers at a Swedish University Hospital

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Dis (Lond)


. 2021 May 11;1-6.
doi: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1925739. Online ahead of print.
Post-outbreak serological screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers at a Swedish University Hospital


Rasmus Strand[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nils Fernstr?m[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Holmberg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yang De Marinis[SUP] 2 3 4 5 [/SUP], Carl-Johan Fraenkel[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Magnus Rasmussen[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Nosocomial outbreaks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can have devastating consequences from both a resource cost and patient healthcare perspective. Relying on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for identifying infected individuals may result in missed cases. Screening for antibodies after an outbreak can help to find missed cases and better illuminate routes of transmission.
Methods: In this study, we present the results of a serological screening of the healthcare workers (HCWs) on a ward for infectious diseases in Sweden with a point-of-care antibody test 8 weeks after an outbreak of COVID-19. In all, 107/123 (87%) of HCWs who were tested with RT-PCR in the outbreak investigation participated in this study on seroprevalence. Participants were also asked to fill out a questionnaire entailing epidemiological data. The cohort was stratified by RT-PCR result and the resulting groups were compared to each other.
Results: Six (8%) HCWs who were tested RT-PCR negative during the outbreak investigation had developed specific IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). These HCWs had all worked shifts with colleagues who later were tested RT-PCR positive during the outbreak.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that a serological follow-up screening after an outbreak may be used as a complement to virus detection in an outbreak situation. However, immunoglobulin (Ig) G-detection should also be performed at the start of an outbreak, to facilitate interpretation of the results.

Keywords: COVID-19; IgG; SARS-CoV-2; antibody test; outbreak; seroconversion.
 
Back
Top Bottom