• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Inflammatory Mediator Expression Associated With Antibody Response Induced by Live Attenuated vs Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine in Children

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 24;5(11):ofy277. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy277. eCollection 2018 Nov.
[h=1]Inflammatory Mediator Expression Associated With Antibody Response Induced by Live Attenuated vs Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccine in Children.[/h] Martin JM[SUP]1[/SUP], Avula R[SUP]2[/SUP], Nowalk MP[SUP]3[/SUP], Lin CJ[SUP]3[/SUP], Horne WT[SUP]1[/SUP], Chandran UR[SUP]2[/SUP], Nagg JP[SUP]1[/SUP], Zimmerman RK[SUP]3[/SUP], Cole KS[SUP]4[/SUP], Alcorn JF[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]Background:[/h] The reasons for differences in vaccine effectiveness between live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) are not clear.
[h=4]Methods:[/h] Blood samples were obtained before vaccination and at days 7 and 21 postvaccination with 2015-2016 quadrivalent IIV or LAIV. Serologic response to the vaccine was measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay. Targeted RNA sequencing and serum cytokine analysis were performed. Paired analyses were used to determine gene expression and were compared between IIV and LAIV recipients. Classification And Regression Trees analysis (CART) identified the strongest associations with vaccine response.
[h=4]Results:[/h] Forty-six enrollees received IIV, and 25 received LAIV. The mean age was 11.5 (?3.7) years. Seroconversion with IIV was associated with changes in expression of PRKRA and IFI6. Nonseroconversion for both IIV and LAIV was characterized by increased interferon-stimulated gene expression. Seroprotection with both vaccines was associated with altered expression of CXCL2 and CD36. For LAIV, CART showed that changes in expression of CD80, CXCL2, and CASP1 were associated with seroprotection. Serum cytokines showed that IIV seroconversion was associated with decreased CCL3. LAIV seroprotection tracked with decreased tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ.
[h=4]Conclusions:[/h] Distinct markers of seroconversion and seroprotection against IIV and LAIV were identified using immunophenotyping and CART analysis.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] RNA seq; antibodies; cytokines; influenza vaccine

PMID: 30515427 PMCID: PMC6262113 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy277
 
Back
Top Bottom