• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influence of distinct criteria for selecting patients for swabbing on estimation of the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Gac Sanit. 2013 Dec 3. pii: S0213-9111(13)00177-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2013.09.007. [Epub ahead of print]
[Influence of distinct criteria for selecting patients for swabbing on estimation of the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine.]
[Article in Spanish]
Mart?nez-Baz I, Guevara M, El?a F, Ezpeleta C, Fern?ndez Alonso M, Castilla J.
Source

Instituto de Salud P?blica de Navarra, Pamplona, Espa?a; CIBER de Epidemiolog?a y Salud P?blica (CIBERESP), Espa?a. Electronic address: imartinba@navarra.es.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:

To estimate the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine under different criteria for selecting patients for swabbing.
METHOD:

A case-control study was performed of laboratory-confirmed cases (n=909) and negative controls for influenza (n=732) in the 2010-2011 to 2012-2013 seasons in Navarre (Spain). The adjusted vaccine effectiveness was estimated by including all swabs from patients with influenza-like-illness and selecting only the first two cases per physician and week.
RESULTS:

The first two patients per physician and week were less frequently vaccinated against influenza (7.9% vs. 12.5%, p=0.021) and less often received confirmation of influenza (53.6% vs. 66.4%, p <0.001) than subsequent patients. These differences decreased after adjustment for covariates. The effectiveness of the influenza vaccine was 49% (95% CI: 23-66%) when all swabs were included and was 55% (95% CI: 27-72%) when we selected the first two swabs per week and physician.
CONCLUSION:

The selection of the first two patients per physician and week may bias assessment of the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine, although this bias was small in the seasons analyzed.

Copyright ? 2013 SESPAS. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS:

Case control study, Diagn?stico de laboratorio, Estudio de casos y controles, Estudios de muestreo, Gripe, Influenza, Influenza vaccine, Laboratory diagnoses, Sampling studies, Selection bias, Sentinel surveillance, Sesgo de selecci?n, Vacuna antigripal, Vigilancia centinela

PMID:
24315408
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Free full text

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24315408
 
Back
Top Bottom