tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
RNA. 2015 Oct 1. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Influenza A virus preferentially snatches noncoding RNA caps.[/h] Gu W[SUP]1[/SUP], Gallagher GR[SUP]2[/SUP], Dai W[SUP]2[/SUP], Liu P[SUP]2[/SUP], Li R[SUP]3[/SUP], Trombly MI[SUP]2[/SUP], Gammon DB[SUP]4[/SUP], Mello CC[SUP]5[/SUP], Wang JP[SUP]2[/SUP], Finberg RW[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Influenza A virus (IAV) lacks the enzyme for adding 5' caps to its RNAs and snatches the 5' ends of host capped RNAs to prime transcription. Neither the preference of the host RNA sequences snatched nor the effect of cap-snatching on host processes is completely defined. Previous studies of influenza cap-snatching used poly(A)-selected RNAs from infected cells or relied on annotated host genes to define the snatched host RNAs, and thus lack details on many noncoding host RNAs including snRNAs, snoRNAs, and promoter-associated capped small (cs)RNAs, which are made by "paused" Pol II during transcription initiation. In this study, we used a nonbiased technique, CapSeq, to identify host and viral-capped RNAs including nonpolyadenylated RNAs in the same samples, and investigated the substrate-product correlation between the host RNAs and the viral RNAs. We demonstrated that noncoding host RNAs, particularly U1 and U2, are the preferred cap-snatching source over mRNAs or pre-mRNAs. We also found that csRNAs are highly snatched by IAV. Because the functions of csRNAs remain mostly unknown, especially in somatic cells, our finding reveals that csRNAs at least play roles in the process of IAV infection. Our findings support a model where nascent RNAs including csRNAs are the preferred targets for cap-snatching by IAV and raise questions about how IAV might use snatching preferences to modulate host-mRNA splicing and transcription.
? 2015 Gu et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] cap-snatching; influenza; noncoding RNA
PMID: 26428694 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
[h=1]Influenza A virus preferentially snatches noncoding RNA caps.[/h] Gu W[SUP]1[/SUP], Gallagher GR[SUP]2[/SUP], Dai W[SUP]2[/SUP], Liu P[SUP]2[/SUP], Li R[SUP]3[/SUP], Trombly MI[SUP]2[/SUP], Gammon DB[SUP]4[/SUP], Mello CC[SUP]5[/SUP], Wang JP[SUP]2[/SUP], Finberg RW[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] Influenza A virus (IAV) lacks the enzyme for adding 5' caps to its RNAs and snatches the 5' ends of host capped RNAs to prime transcription. Neither the preference of the host RNA sequences snatched nor the effect of cap-snatching on host processes is completely defined. Previous studies of influenza cap-snatching used poly(A)-selected RNAs from infected cells or relied on annotated host genes to define the snatched host RNAs, and thus lack details on many noncoding host RNAs including snRNAs, snoRNAs, and promoter-associated capped small (cs)RNAs, which are made by "paused" Pol II during transcription initiation. In this study, we used a nonbiased technique, CapSeq, to identify host and viral-capped RNAs including nonpolyadenylated RNAs in the same samples, and investigated the substrate-product correlation between the host RNAs and the viral RNAs. We demonstrated that noncoding host RNAs, particularly U1 and U2, are the preferred cap-snatching source over mRNAs or pre-mRNAs. We also found that csRNAs are highly snatched by IAV. Because the functions of csRNAs remain mostly unknown, especially in somatic cells, our finding reveals that csRNAs at least play roles in the process of IAV infection. Our findings support a model where nascent RNAs including csRNAs are the preferred targets for cap-snatching by IAV and raise questions about how IAV might use snatching preferences to modulate host-mRNA splicing and transcription.
? 2015 Gu et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the RNA Society.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] cap-snatching; influenza; noncoding RNA
PMID: 26428694 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]