tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 27;7(3)
faa066. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa066. eCollection 2020 Mar.
Influenza and Bacterial Coinfection in Adults With Community-Acquired Pneumonia Admitted to Conventional Wards: Risk Factors, Clinical Features, and Outcomes.
Abelenda-Alonso G[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Rombauts A[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Gudiol C[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Meije Y[SUP]5[/SUP], Ortega L[SUP]5[/SUP], Clemente M[SUP]5[/SUP], Ardanuy C[SUP]6[/SUP], Niub? J[SUP]6[/SUP], Carratal? J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP].
Author information
Abstract
Background:
Relevance of viral and bacterial coinfection (VBC) in non-intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is poorly characterized. We aim to determine risk factors, features, and outcomes of VBC-CAP in this setting.
Methods:
This is a prospective cohort of adults admitted to conventional wards with CAP. Patients were divided into VBC-CAP, viral CAP (V-CAP), and bacterial CAP (B-CAP) groups. Independent risk and prognostic factors for VBC-CAP were identified.
Results:
We documented 1123 episodes: 57 (5.1%) VBC-CAP, 98 (8.7%) V-CAP, and 968 (86.1%) B-CAP. Patients with VBC-CAP were younger than those with B-CAP (54 vs 71 years; P < .001). Chronic respiratory disease was more frequent in patients with VBC-CAP than in those with V-CAP (26.3% vs 14.3%%; P = .001). Among those with influenza (n = 153), the VBC-CAP group received empirical oseltamivir less often (56.1% vs 73.5%; P < .001). Patients with VBC-CAP also had more respiratory distress (21.1% VBC-CAP; 19.4% V-CAP, and 9.8% B-CAP; P < .001) and required ICU admission more often (31.6% VBC-CAP, 31.6% V-CAP, and 12.8% B-CAP; P < .001). The 30-day case-fatality rate was 3.5% in the VBC-CAP group, 3.1% in the V-CAP group, and 6.3% in the B-CAP group (P = .232). Furthermore, VBC-CAP was associated with severity criteria (odds ratio [OR], 5.219; P < .001) and lack of empirical oseltamivir therapy in influenza cases (OR, 0.401; P < .043).
Conclusions:
Viral and bacterial coinfection-CAP involved younger patients with comorbidities and with poor influenza vaccination rate. Patients with VBC-CAP presented more respiratory complications and more often required ICU admission. Nevertheless, 30-day mortality rate was low and related either to severity criteria or to delayed initiation of oseltamivir therapy.
? The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
KEYWORDS:
clinical features; coinfection; community-acquired pneumonia; influenza virus; prognostic factors
PMID:32206675PMCID:PMC7081386DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaa066
faa066. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa066. eCollection 2020 Mar.Influenza and Bacterial Coinfection in Adults With Community-Acquired Pneumonia Admitted to Conventional Wards: Risk Factors, Clinical Features, and Outcomes.
Abelenda-Alonso G[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Rombauts A[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Gudiol C[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Meije Y[SUP]5[/SUP], Ortega L[SUP]5[/SUP], Clemente M[SUP]5[/SUP], Ardanuy C[SUP]6[/SUP], Niub? J[SUP]6[/SUP], Carratal? J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP].
Author information
Abstract
Background:
Relevance of viral and bacterial coinfection (VBC) in non-intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is poorly characterized. We aim to determine risk factors, features, and outcomes of VBC-CAP in this setting.
Methods:
This is a prospective cohort of adults admitted to conventional wards with CAP. Patients were divided into VBC-CAP, viral CAP (V-CAP), and bacterial CAP (B-CAP) groups. Independent risk and prognostic factors for VBC-CAP were identified.
Results:
We documented 1123 episodes: 57 (5.1%) VBC-CAP, 98 (8.7%) V-CAP, and 968 (86.1%) B-CAP. Patients with VBC-CAP were younger than those with B-CAP (54 vs 71 years; P < .001). Chronic respiratory disease was more frequent in patients with VBC-CAP than in those with V-CAP (26.3% vs 14.3%%; P = .001). Among those with influenza (n = 153), the VBC-CAP group received empirical oseltamivir less often (56.1% vs 73.5%; P < .001). Patients with VBC-CAP also had more respiratory distress (21.1% VBC-CAP; 19.4% V-CAP, and 9.8% B-CAP; P < .001) and required ICU admission more often (31.6% VBC-CAP, 31.6% V-CAP, and 12.8% B-CAP; P < .001). The 30-day case-fatality rate was 3.5% in the VBC-CAP group, 3.1% in the V-CAP group, and 6.3% in the B-CAP group (P = .232). Furthermore, VBC-CAP was associated with severity criteria (odds ratio [OR], 5.219; P < .001) and lack of empirical oseltamivir therapy in influenza cases (OR, 0.401; P < .043).
Conclusions:
Viral and bacterial coinfection-CAP involved younger patients with comorbidities and with poor influenza vaccination rate. Patients with VBC-CAP presented more respiratory complications and more often required ICU admission. Nevertheless, 30-day mortality rate was low and related either to severity criteria or to delayed initiation of oseltamivir therapy.
? The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
KEYWORDS:
clinical features; coinfection; community-acquired pneumonia; influenza virus; prognostic factors
PMID:32206675PMCID:PMC7081386DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaa066