tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 26;6(6)
fz192. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz192. eCollection 2019 Jun.
[h=1]Influenza Antiviral Prescribing Practices and the Influence of Rapid Testing Among Primary Care Providers in the US, 2009-2016.[/h] Fowlkes AL[SUP]1[/SUP], Steffens A[SUP]1[/SUP], Reed C[SUP]1[/SUP], Temte JL[SUP]2[/SUP], Campbell AP[SUP]1[/SUP]; Influenza Incidence Surveillance Project Working Group.
[h=3]Collaborators (24)[/h]
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]Background:[/h] Early influenza antiviral treatment within 2 days of illness onset can reduce illness severity and duration. Reliance on low sensitivity rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) to guide antiviral prescribing has been reported. We describe antiviral prescribing practices among primary care providers from a large surveillance network in the United States.
[h=4]Methods:[/h] From 2009-2016, a network of 36 to 68 outpatient clinics per year collected respiratory specimens and clinical data for patients with influenza-like illness (ILI). Specimens were tested for influenza using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess factors influencing antiviral prescribing.
[h=4]Results:[/h] Among 13 540 patients with ILI, 2766 (20%) were prescribed antivirals. In age groups recommended to receive empiric antiviral treatment for suspected influenza, 11% of children <2 years and 23% of adults ≥65 years received a prescription. Among 3681 patients with a positive PCR test for influenza, 40% tested negative by RIDT. In multivariable analysis, prescription receipt was strongly associated with a positive RIDT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12, 95% CI 11-14) and symptom onset ≤2 days before visit (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 3.8-4.9). Antiviral prescribing was also more frequent among pediatric and private family practice clinics compared with community health centers (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.2, and 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, respectively).
[h=4]Conclusion:[/h] Primary care providers were more likely to prescribe antivirals to patients with a positive RIDT, but antivirals were prescribed infrequently even to patients in high-risk age groups. Understanding patient and provider characteristics associated with antiviral prescribing is important for communicating treatment recommendations.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] antiviral treatment; influenza; neuraminidase inhibitors; primary care
PMID: 31205973 PMCID: PMC6557305 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz192
fz192. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz192. eCollection 2019 Jun.[h=1]Influenza Antiviral Prescribing Practices and the Influence of Rapid Testing Among Primary Care Providers in the US, 2009-2016.[/h] Fowlkes AL[SUP]1[/SUP], Steffens A[SUP]1[/SUP], Reed C[SUP]1[/SUP], Temte JL[SUP]2[/SUP], Campbell AP[SUP]1[/SUP]; Influenza Incidence Surveillance Project Working Group.
[h=3]Collaborators (24)[/h]
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]Background:[/h] Early influenza antiviral treatment within 2 days of illness onset can reduce illness severity and duration. Reliance on low sensitivity rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) to guide antiviral prescribing has been reported. We describe antiviral prescribing practices among primary care providers from a large surveillance network in the United States.
[h=4]Methods:[/h] From 2009-2016, a network of 36 to 68 outpatient clinics per year collected respiratory specimens and clinical data for patients with influenza-like illness (ILI). Specimens were tested for influenza using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We used multivariable logistic regression to assess factors influencing antiviral prescribing.
[h=4]Results:[/h] Among 13 540 patients with ILI, 2766 (20%) were prescribed antivirals. In age groups recommended to receive empiric antiviral treatment for suspected influenza, 11% of children <2 years and 23% of adults ≥65 years received a prescription. Among 3681 patients with a positive PCR test for influenza, 40% tested negative by RIDT. In multivariable analysis, prescription receipt was strongly associated with a positive RIDT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12, 95% CI 11-14) and symptom onset ≤2 days before visit (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 3.8-4.9). Antiviral prescribing was also more frequent among pediatric and private family practice clinics compared with community health centers (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.2, and 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5, respectively).
[h=4]Conclusion:[/h] Primary care providers were more likely to prescribe antivirals to patients with a positive RIDT, but antivirals were prescribed infrequently even to patients in high-risk age groups. Understanding patient and provider characteristics associated with antiviral prescribing is important for communicating treatment recommendations.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] antiviral treatment; influenza; neuraminidase inhibitors; primary care
PMID: 31205973 PMCID: PMC6557305 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz192