tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses
. 2021 Apr 4.
doi: 10.1111/irv.12857. Online ahead of print.
Point-of-care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study
Benjamin Perlitz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Slagman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jennifer Hitzek[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dorothee Riedlinger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Martin M?ckel[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Seasonal influenza is a burden for emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study was to investigate whether point-of-care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether point-of-care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Methods: Using a cross-over design, the cobas? Liat? Influenza A/B POC PCR test (Liat) was compared with standard clinical practice during the 2019/2020 influenza season. All adult patients (aged ? 18 years) with fever (?38?C) and respiratory symptoms were included. Primary end points were the prevalence of influenza infections in the ED and staff sick days. Secondary end points were frequency of antiviral and antibacterial therapy, time between admission and test result or treatment initiation, patient disposition, ED length of stay (LOS), and for inpatients mortality and LOS. Nurses were interviewed about handling and integration of POC testing. The occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infections coincided with the second half of the study.
Results: A total of 828 patients were enrolled in the study. All 375 patients of the intervention group were tested with Liat, and 103 patients of them (27.6%) tested positive. During the intervention period, staff sick days were reduced by 34.4% (P = .023). Significantly, more patients in the intervention group received antiviral therapy with neuraminidase inhibitors (7.2% vs 3.8%, P = .028) and tested patients received antibiotics more frequently (40.0% vs 31.6%, P = .033). Patients with POC test were transferred to external hospitals significantly more often (5.6% vs 1.3%, P = .01).
Conclusion: We conclude that POC testing for influenza is useful in the ED, especially if it is heavily frequented by patients with respiratory symptoms.
Keywords: emergency department; influenza; point-of-care testing; polymerase chain reaction; staff protection.
. 2021 Apr 4.
doi: 10.1111/irv.12857. Online ahead of print.
Point-of-care testing for influenza in a university emergency department: A prospective study
Benjamin Perlitz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Slagman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jennifer Hitzek[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dorothee Riedlinger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Martin M?ckel[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33817983
- DOI: 10.1111/irv.12857
Abstract
Background: Seasonal influenza is a burden for emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study was to investigate whether point-of-care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether point-of-care (POC) PCR testing can be used to reduce staff sick days and improve diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Methods: Using a cross-over design, the cobas? Liat? Influenza A/B POC PCR test (Liat) was compared with standard clinical practice during the 2019/2020 influenza season. All adult patients (aged ? 18 years) with fever (?38?C) and respiratory symptoms were included. Primary end points were the prevalence of influenza infections in the ED and staff sick days. Secondary end points were frequency of antiviral and antibacterial therapy, time between admission and test result or treatment initiation, patient disposition, ED length of stay (LOS), and for inpatients mortality and LOS. Nurses were interviewed about handling and integration of POC testing. The occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infections coincided with the second half of the study.
Results: A total of 828 patients were enrolled in the study. All 375 patients of the intervention group were tested with Liat, and 103 patients of them (27.6%) tested positive. During the intervention period, staff sick days were reduced by 34.4% (P = .023). Significantly, more patients in the intervention group received antiviral therapy with neuraminidase inhibitors (7.2% vs 3.8%, P = .028) and tested patients received antibiotics more frequently (40.0% vs 31.6%, P = .033). Patients with POC test were transferred to external hospitals significantly more often (5.6% vs 1.3%, P = .01).
Conclusion: We conclude that POC testing for influenza is useful in the ED, especially if it is heavily frequented by patients with respiratory symptoms.
Keywords: emergency department; influenza; point-of-care testing; polymerase chain reaction; staff protection.