• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Influenza Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Dec 21. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02844-y. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Influenza Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness in Pregnant Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.[/h]
Quach THT[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Mallis NA[SUP]1[/SUP], Cordero JF[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. 2 Institute for Global Health, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. 3 Faculty of Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HUTECH), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. 4 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. jcordero@uga.edu.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] Pregnant women have a high risk for complications from influenza infection, but vaccination rates within this group remain low in the US and other countries. The efficacy and effectiveness of the influenza vaccine are a key determinant of vaccine uptake. This review aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the protection of both seasonal and monovalent pandemic H1N1 (pdmH1N1) vaccine against laboratory-confirmed influenza (LCI), influenza-like illness (ILI), and respiratory illness (RI).
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A search of the literature was undertaken from Pubmed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to Aug 1, 2018. Both observational studies and clinical trials were considered.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Nineteen studies were identified from 11 countries. Women with pdmH1N1 vaccination had a lower risk of getting LCI (Relative risk [RR] 0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.35) and ILI (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06-0.36)). The pooled estimate from three randomized clinical trials (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.71) and two case control studies (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23-0.61) showed that the seasonal vaccine was protective against LCI. The seasonal vaccine was not protective against ILI (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.03). This association was similar for the outcome of RI (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.20).
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] This analysis bolsters existing evidence that influenza vaccines are effective among pregnant women. Additional public health efforts are needed to promote physician recommendations of influenza vaccination in pregnancy.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Influenza; Meta-analysis; Pregnancy; Vaccine effectiveness; Vaccine efficacy

PMID: 31865602 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-019-02844-y
 
Back
Top Bottom