• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Innovation (N Y) . Comparative sensitivity of different respiratory specimen types for molecular diagnosis and monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 shedding in

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Innovation (N Y)


. 2020 Nov 4;100061.
doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100061. Online ahead of print.
Comparative sensitivity of different respiratory specimen types for molecular diagnosis and monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 shedding in COVID-19 patients


Yang Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Minghui Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jing Yuan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fuxiang Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhaoqin Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jinxiu Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mingxia Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Li Xing[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jinli Wei[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ling Peng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gary Wong[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Haixia Zheng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Weibo Wu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chenguang Shen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mingfeng Liao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kai Feng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jianming Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qianting Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Juanjuan Zhao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lei Liu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yingxia Liu[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The global pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is now ongoing. Rapid and accurate detection of the causative virus SARS-CoV-2 is vital for the treatment and control of COVID-19. In this study, the comparative sensitivity of different respiratory specimens were retrospectively analyzed using 3552 clinical samples from 410 Guangdong CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) confirmed COVID-19 patients. Except for BALF, the sputum possessed the highest positive rate (73.4%∼87.5%), followed by nasal swabs (53.1%∼85.3%) for both severe and mild cases during the first 14 days after illness onset (d.a.o). Viral RNA could be detected in all BALF from the severe group collected as early as 4 days after illness onset (d.a.o) and lasted up to 46 d.a.o., while none of BALF samples from mild group. Moreover, although viral RNA was negative in the upper respiratory samples, it was also positive in BALF samples in most cases from severe group during treatment. Despite of typical ground-glass opacity observed via computed tomographic (CT) scans, no viral RNA was detected in the first 3 or all upper respiratory tract specimens from some COVID-19 patients. In conclusion, sputum is most sensitive for routine laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19, followed by nasal swabs. Detection of viral RNAs in BLAF improves diagnostic accuracy in severe COVID-19 patients.
 
Back
Top Bottom