• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Clin Pract . A pre-systematic review on use of masks as protection material for SARS-COV-2 during COVID-19 pandemic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Clin Pract


. 2021 Apr 13;e14215.
doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14215. Online ahead of print.
A pre-systematic review on use of masks as protection material for SARS-COV-2 during COVID-19 pandemic


Carla Pires[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China on 31 December 2019.
Aims: To review, analyse and discuss all works about the wearing and development of facemasks as potential protection against SARS-COV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: PubMed, SciELO, Google Scholar and DOAJ were browsed.
Keywords: 'mask and (SARS or Cov)' (1 August 2019 to 12 April 2020).
Inclusion criteria: original research. PRISMA criteria were followed.
Results: 21 works were selected. Identified topics: effectiveness of protective equipment/devices (PE) (n=3), universal wearing of facemasks plus other protective measures in the community (n=3), impact of infection control measures on hospitals and epidemiological tracing (n=3), development of new PE (n=2), sanitisation of facemasks (n=4), clinical guidance (n=4) and questionnaires (n=2).
Discussion: It seems that the effectiveness of PE, namely facemasks, is not fully known. Universal wearing of facemasks may be simultaneously recommended with other protective measures. Nosocomial and community infections seem to be preventable. New PE, methods of facemask sanitisation and clinical guidance are emerging, but caution is recommended regarding their adoption, revision and monitoring by international boards and institutions. Questionnaires are useful tools for collecting citizens' opinions on implementing public health measures, and thus contribute to mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusions: Universal wearing of facemasks in the community is likely to be recommend during the COVID-19pandemic. Since SARS-COV-2 is highly contagious, a set of measures should be considered. Facemask sanitisation is possible, but standardised procedures are lacking. New PE is emerging and requires detailed regulatory approval. It is advisable to follow popular opinion.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-COV-2; facemasks; masks; pandemics; personal protective equipment; protection material; protective devices.
 
Back
Top Bottom