• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Environ Res Public Health . Co-Infections in Critically Ill Patients with or without COVID-19: A Comparison of Clinical Microbial Culture Fin

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Environ Res Public Health


. 2021 Apr 20;18(8):4358.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084358.
Co-Infections in Critically Ill Patients with or without COVID-19: A Comparison of Clinical Microbial Culture Findings


Rosario Cultrera[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Agostino Barozzi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Marco Libanore[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Elisabetta Marangoni[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Roberto Pora[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Brunella Quarta[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Savino Spadaro[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Riccardo Ragazzi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Anna Marra[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Daniela Segala[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carlo Alberto Volta[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Co-infections in critically ill patients hospitalized for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have an important impact on the outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We compared the microbial isolations found in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit (ICU) with those in a non-COVID-19 ICU from 22 February to 30 April 2020 and in the same period of 2019. We considered blood, urine or respiratory specimens obtained with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or bronchial aspirate (BASP), collected from all patients admitted in ICUs with or without COVID-19 infection. We found a higher frequency of infections due to methicillin-resistant (MR) staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Candida parapsilosis in COVID-19-positive patients admitted in ICUs compared to those who were COVID-19 negative. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more frequently isolated from patients admitted in non-COVID-19 ICUs. Several conditions favor the increased frequency of these infections by antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Among all, the severity of the respiratory tracts was definitely decisive, which required assisted ventilation with invasive procedures. The turnover in the ICU of a large number of patients in a very short time requiring urgent invasive interventions has favored the not always suitable execution of assistance procedures. No less important is the increased exposure to infectious risk from bacteria and fungi in patients with severe impairment due to ventilation. The highest costs for antifungal drugs were shown in the ICU-COVID group.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antimicrobial consumption; antimicrobial expenditure; co-infection; intensive care unit; microbial culture.
 
Back
Top Bottom