• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2022 Mar 29;S1201-9712(22)00176-X.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.037. Online ahead of print.
Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting


Sabrina Jegerlehner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Franziska Suter-Riniker[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Philipp Jent[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pascal Bittel[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michael Nagler[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests with saliva facilitate examination in settings that lack trained personnel. However, little is known on the diagnostic accuracy in real-life clinical settings. Therefore, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of a saliva antigen test to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in a primary/ secondary care testing facility.
Methods: Individuals presented at a COVID-19 testing facility affiliated with a Swiss University Hospital were prospectively recruited (n=377). Saliva specimen was obtained, and the PCL Inc. COVID19 Gold antigen test was conducted in parallel with two real-time PCR.
Results: RT-PCR was positive in 53 individuals, corresponding to a prevalence of 14.1% (missing material in one individual). The PCL saliva antigen test was positive in 22 individuals (5.8%), and negative in 354 (93.9%). The sensitivity of the saliva antigen test was 30.2% (95% confidence interval, CI, 18.3 to 44.3), both overall and in symptomatic individiduals. The specificity was 98.1% (96.0, 99.3).
Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen test in a primary/ secondary care testing facility was remarkably lower compared to the manufacturers' specifications. Keywords Infections/*epidemiology/transmission; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [Supplementary Concept]; COVID-19 diagnostic testing [Supplementary Concept] Background.
 
Back
Top Bottom