tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis
. 2020 Jun 1;S1201-9712(20)30399-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.092. Online ahead of print.
HUMAN CORONAVIRUS DATA FROM FOUR CLINICAL TRIALS OF MASKS AND RESPIRATORS
C Raina MacIntyre[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Abrar A Chughtai[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Holly Seale[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dominic E Dwyer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Wang Quanyi[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
There are few published data on the protection of masks or respirators against coronavirus infections. This is an important research question to inform the response to the COVID-19 epidemic. The transmission modes of human coronaviruses are similar, thought to be by droplet, contact and sometimes airborne routes. There are several randomised clinical trials of masks and respirators, but most used clinical endpoints or tested only for influenza. In four trials which we conducted, we tested for human coronaviruses, but only composite viral endpoints were reported in the trials. We reviewed and analysed the coronavirus data from four of our trials. Laboratory-confirmed coronavirus infections were identified in our community household trial (1 case), health worker trials (8 cases) and trial of mask use by sick patients (19 cases). No coronavirus infections were transmitted in households to parents who wore P2 or surgical masks, but one child with coronavirus infection transmitted infection to a parent in the control arm. No transmissions to close contacts occurred when worn by sick patients with coronavirus infections. There was a higher risk of coronavirus infection in HCWs who wore a mask compared to a respirator, but the difference was not statistically significant. These are the only available data on coronavirus infections associated with mask or respirator use. More clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of respiratory protection against coronavirus infections.
Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; masks; personal protective equipment; respirators.
. 2020 Jun 1;S1201-9712(20)30399-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.092. Online ahead of print.
HUMAN CORONAVIRUS DATA FROM FOUR CLINICAL TRIALS OF MASKS AND RESPIRATORS
C Raina MacIntyre[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Abrar A Chughtai[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Holly Seale[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dominic E Dwyer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Wang Quanyi[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 32497810
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.092
Abstract
There are few published data on the protection of masks or respirators against coronavirus infections. This is an important research question to inform the response to the COVID-19 epidemic. The transmission modes of human coronaviruses are similar, thought to be by droplet, contact and sometimes airborne routes. There are several randomised clinical trials of masks and respirators, but most used clinical endpoints or tested only for influenza. In four trials which we conducted, we tested for human coronaviruses, but only composite viral endpoints were reported in the trials. We reviewed and analysed the coronavirus data from four of our trials. Laboratory-confirmed coronavirus infections were identified in our community household trial (1 case), health worker trials (8 cases) and trial of mask use by sick patients (19 cases). No coronavirus infections were transmitted in households to parents who wore P2 or surgical masks, but one child with coronavirus infection transmitted infection to a parent in the control arm. No transmissions to close contacts occurred when worn by sick patients with coronavirus infections. There was a higher risk of coronavirus infection in HCWs who wore a mask compared to a respirator, but the difference was not statistically significant. These are the only available data on coronavirus infections associated with mask or respirator use. More clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of respiratory protection against coronavirus infections.
Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; masks; personal protective equipment; respirators.