• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Main Differences Between the First and Second Waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2021 Mar 5;S1201-9712(21)00201-0.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.115. Online ahead of print.
Main Differences Between the First and Second Waves of COVID-19 in Madrid, Spain


Vicente Soriano[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pilar Ganado-Pinilla[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Miguel Sanchez-Santos[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Felix G?mez-Gallego[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pablo Barreiro[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carmen de Mendoza[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Octavio Corral[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The surge and rapid global spreading of SARS-CoV-2 infection has deeply challenged health services and disrupted social and economic activities worldwide. In Spain, the arrival of the first pandemic wave occurred in mid-March 2020 and lasted for 3 months, being abated with home confinement and strict lockdown. After relaxing measures during summer, a second wave began in mid-September and extended until Christmas 2020.
Methods: We compared the main features of SARS-CoV-2 infections during the two pandemic waves. We examined the information collected with rapid diagnostic tests and PCR at one university clinic in Madrid, epicenter of the pandemic in Spain.
Results: A total of 1569 individuals (968 during the 1[SUP]st[/SUP] wave and 601 during the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] wave) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies using finger prick capillary blood. In addition, during the second wave, 346 persons were tested for SARS-CoV-2 specific antigens using either oral swab or saliva. The overall seroprevalence of first-time tested persons was 12.6% during the 1[SUP]st[/SUP] wave and 7.7% during the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] wave (p < 0.01). Seroconversions and seroreversions were noticed within 6 months at low rates, both below 5%. Positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen during the 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] wave was recognized in 3.5% of tested individuals, being two cases considered as reinfections. Severe clinical symptoms occurred in a greater proportion during the first wave compared to the second wave (27.8% vs 10.6%, respectively; p = 0.03).
Conclusion: The cumulative seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Madrid at the end of year 2020 was around 20%. Seroreversions within six months occurred in 4%. Seroconversions and reinfections during the second wave were clinically less severe than during the 1[SUP]st[/SUP] wave. Hypothetically, promotion of wider face masking, outdoor activities, and gathering restrictions during the 2nd wave most likely contributed to reduced exposures to large size inoculum.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; coronavirus; prevalence; reinfections.
 
Back
Top Bottom