• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Int J Infect Dis . Performance assessment of 11 commercial serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 on hospitalized COVID-19 patients

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis


. 2021 Jan 20;S1201-9712(21)00049-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.038. Online ahead of print.
Performance assessment of 11 commercial serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 on hospitalized COVID-19 patients


C Serre-Miranda[SUP] 1 [/SUP], C Nobrega[SUP] 1 [/SUP], S Roque[SUP] 1 [/SUP], J Canto-Gomes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], C S Silva[SUP] 1 [/SUP], N Vieira[SUP] 1 [/SUP], P Barreira-Silva[SUP] 1 [/SUP], P Alves-Peixoto[SUP] 1 [/SUP], J Cotter[SUP] 2 [/SUP], A Reis[SUP] 3 [/SUP], M Formigo[SUP] 3 [/SUP], H Sarmento[SUP] 3 [/SUP], O Pires[SUP] 4 [/SUP], A Carvalho[SUP] 5 [/SUP], D Y Petrovykh[SUP] 6 [/SUP], L Di?guez[SUP] 6 [/SUP], J C Sousa[SUP] 1 [/SUP], N Sousa[SUP] 7 [/SUP], C Capela[SUP] 5 [/SUP], J A Palha[SUP] 7 [/SUP], P G Cunha[SUP] 2 [/SUP], M Correia-Neves[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Commercial availability of serological tests to evaluate immunoglobulins (Ig) towards severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has grown exponentially since the onset of disease outbreak. Their thorough validation is of extreme importance before using them as epidemiological tools to infer seroprevalence in specific populations, and as complementary diagnostic tools to molecular approaches (e.g. RT- qPCR).
Methods: Commercial serological tests from 11 suppliers were assayed side-by-side using 126 samples from SARS-CoV-2-infected inpatients, and 36 healthy and HIV-infected individuals.
Results: Most of the tests assayed have >95% specificity. For sensitivity calculation, samples were stratified by days since symptoms onset; sensitivity peaks at 16-21 days for IgM and IgA (maximum: 91.2%; Euroimmun); and, varying with the test, at 16-21 or at >21 days for IgG (maximum: 94.1%; Snibe). Data from semiquantitative tests show that patients with severe clinical outcome, in comparison with patients with a non-severe presentation, reveal lower levels of Ig against SARS-CoV-2 at <10 days since symptoms onset, and higher levels at >21 days.
Conclusions: This study highlights the sensitivity heterogeneity accompanied by an almost general high specificity of most tests and sets the basis for the usefulness of these tests as a complement for diagnosis and population seroprevalence studies.

Keywords: COVID-19; Clinical presentation; Qualitative and semiquantitative tests; Sensitivity; Serological tests; Specificity.
 
Back
Top Bottom